TwoDeep3;3134313 said:
Pretty stats in Sept through November must now be the criteria for excellence at the quarterback position.
I was never much of a Danny White fan and his also-ran status.
After the Giant's game I saw posts on several boards expressing the sentiment that you cannot blame Tony for this loss.
So the yardstick is now not wins and losses but how well Romo played.
Sorry, I take the losses hard and although Romo played a pretty terrific game, the team still lost.
I'd just like to see what the end result would have been if he hit Roy Williams for the obvious TD instead of overthrowing him by almost ten-yards.
But what the hey...Romo threw for 392-yards and three touchdowns.
I wonder if the City of Dallas is planning a parade?
Normally, you make a lot of sense.
But here, you are off the reservation.
Romo missed the Roy Williams throw, no doubt about it. The problem isn't so much that he missed that 1 throw. The problem is... why did we need that one throw?
Romo missed a couple of passes. Out of 55 attempts, guess what, that's going to happen. Hell, that's going to happen on half the total attempts.
But when your starting QB has 392 yards, 3 TDs, and 0 INTs... you should win that game.
We didn't.
That statline SHOULD get a W just about every time.
But it didn't.
Why?
(Hint; the answer isn't Romo).
Now, to be fair, if Romo goes out on Sunday and throws up a dud and we win; I'll give the team credit for winning and criticise Romo for poor play. And that's how it should be.
But to hinge the Giants loss on Romo; no. He made more than enough plays that a mediocre defensive effort would have ensured victory. But we didn't get that.