I don't get the logic that, "We've spent picks on D for x years, so now we should go offense." So for instance, if all those picks were busts, while later picks on O were hits, we should neglect D just to do something different now? No, you keep trying until you fix it. Our O was better than our D last year... I think it's that simple.
And besides, we've spent most of our FA money on the offense lately: Owens, Kosier, Colombo, Gurode, Davis.
Anyway, I think we need a passrusher most of all. Right now we have one proven one and one aging, injured one. I love the ability of Wade's scheme to free guys up, but we still need someone with a talent for getting to the QB.
I think we also need a cover safety so we can get Roy out of the deep zones on obvious passing downs. This is why the "But we have Watkins" posts are irrelevant, IMO... I like Watkins, too, but we need another one to pair with him situationally. Every other safety on the team is a strong safety type, and we need at least two guys who can cover -- Watkins and someone else.
We obviously need a NT, but that will probably be one of those developmental guys posted about recently. They won't go before the 3rd, maybe the 4th.
IMO wide receiver is an overrated position. I've rarely if ever seen WR be the key to a Super Bowl win. So I don't care too much if we're getting older there. Take another developmental guy and add Austin to whoever we get. Even if we got rid of both Glenn and Owens next year, there are always serviceable WRs in FA.
I wouldn't mind a big, mean guard or even a tackle if good value is there.