Bijan Robinson at 26th

RomoIsGod

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,078
Reaction score
4,369
If he's still there at 26 I would draft him. Zeke is done. Pollard. Great back but with that injury. I don't know. I wouldn't sign Pollard long term but I might would franchise tag him for 1 year. Pollard will never be an every down back but Bijan can if need be. Thoughts?
 

tomsanders921

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,734
Reaction score
4,032
If he's still there at 26 I would draft him. Zeke is done. Pollard. Great back but with that injury. I don't know. I wouldn't sign Pollard long term but I might would franchise tag him for 1 year. Pollard will never be an every down back but Bijan can if need be. Thoughts?
No way would I tag Pollard after drafting Robinson.
 

nightrain

Since 1971
Messages
14,539
Reaction score
24,397
Only if they move on from both Zeke and Pollard and they hit FA for a blue chip player (DT or OL).
 

Carson

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,946
Reaction score
64,957
Problem is what if he goes to NY? Pollard signs elsewhere, you cut Zeke and then he’s gone.

Then you have Davis at RB
 

Aven8

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,011
Reaction score
43,385
I’ve seen a lot of people saying draft him and keep Pollard. I think that’s a dumb idea. Roll with Pollard, and Davis or draft pick, or draft pick, Davis, and another draft pick.

One thing I wouldn’t mind looking into is Myles Sanders. Depending on the cost. He is underrated and fast.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,050
Reaction score
84,635
Problem is what if he goes to NY? Pollard signs elsewhere, you cut Zeke and then he’s gone.

Then you have Davis at RB
RB class is loaded..

What would suck is Pollard goes to the Eagles or Commaders.
 
Messages
18,218
Reaction score
28,527
Very good RB's can be found 3 and 4 rounds deep. No need to focus on a single area, but if there is good value at DT, I would go there
 

RustyBourneHorse

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,727
Reaction score
42,561
I’ve seen a lot of people saying draft him and keep Pollard. I think that’s a dumb idea. Roll with Pollard, and Davis or draft pick, or draft pick, Davis, and another draft pick.

One thing I wouldn’t mind looking into is Myles Sanders. Depending on the cost. He is underrated and fast.
I'd love to poach Myles Sanders from Philly. That'd be payback for them poaching Murray.
 

nathanlt

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,003
Reaction score
2,970
If he's still there at 26 I would draft him. Zeke is done. Pollard. Great back but with that injury. I don't know. I wouldn't sign Pollard long term but I might would franchise tag him for 1 year. Pollard will never be an every down back but Bijan can if need be. Thoughts?
Seems very reasonable. Of course from Pollards perspective, not good. Running backs have a drastically limited shelf life, (especially undersized speedsters) and there comes a point where the tag is practically unethical to use until the running back's ability is inevitably diminished.

But for the good of the team, yes.
 

CowboyoWales

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,886
Reaction score
4,248
Corner
WR
DL
LB
OL
RB

All needs I think.

Schultz is likely gone too and TE’s are hard to replace although I feel like Jake Ferguson is the real deal.
The only position missing ....QB.

We go BPA (Inc QB nd/or RB)....for me an effective running game is Dak's best friend (even more so than additional receivers).
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,050
Reaction score
84,635
The only position missing ....QB.

We go BPA (Inc QB nd/or RB)....for me an effective running game is Dak's best friend (even more so than additional receivers).

I know man.. It’s all pointless till the Dak deal is done and over with.

He locked us into mediocrity with no chance at a championship. You just can’t pay guys like him and win it all.
 

CowboyoWales

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,886
Reaction score
4,248
I know man.. It’s all pointless till the Dak deal is done and over with.

He locked us into mediocrity with no chance at a championship. You just can’t pay guys like him and win it all.
Yep, for me this draft is akin to us drafting Tyler last year.....seeing we need a LT and taking him (even if we needed to ease him into the position).
If we take a QB (if there's one we like at 26) we could even trade for a WR ....he'll hopefully help improve Dak, or will be in place for the eventual promotions of the draftee.
Either way let's hope we don't do the Taco drafting for need.
 

Hardline

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,827
Reaction score
36,367
Very good RB's can be found 3 and 4 rounds deep. No need to focus on a single area, but if there is good value at DT, I would go there



Go look at the top 10 in rushing every year and see where they were drafted. The whole you can get a good RB in later rounds is a myth.









Go
 
Top