Kangaroo
Active Member
- Messages
- 9,893
- Reaction score
- 1
Naruto said:Stupid post. How you could miss the blatant irony in that post is beyond me.
hehe I took the test before lol Naruto
Naruto said:Stupid post. How you could miss the blatant irony in that post is beyond me.
I see no evidence of their decline at all. They were overwhelmed my injuries this year. That will kill any team. Considering everything they had to overcome they accomplished quite a bit. Next year they will still be one of the favorites in the AFC.dthahn said:The first year Belichick has to coach without his two best assistants, what happens? The team gets their arses kicked in the second round. Mark it, this team is on the decline and Belichick will never take another whiff of a Superbowl.
big dog cowboy said:I see no evidence of their decline at all. They were overwhelmed my injuries this year. That will kill any team. Considering everything they had to overcome they accomplished quite a bit. Next year they will still be one of the favorites in the AFC.
BigDFan5 said:Belichick can't win without his coodinators. I give the credit for all the Pats success to Crennel, and Weiss
burmafrd said:Injuries do not explain their whole season. They had most of them back for this game- as the announcers and everyone else KEPT mentioning.
They could not run the ball this year. They were one dimensional- and it caught up to them in the playoffs like it does to EVERY TEAM.
Brady did not have a good game- coincidence that Brady has had SEVERAL bad games this year without Weis to hold his hand? Their D- even with most of the missing back- could not make the critical stops they used to.
The Pats have NEVER had that much talent that they could runover people- a LOT of it was coaching- and a lot of it was the assistant coaches.
They do not have that big edge now- so that is that.
Jimmie said:5 turnovers caused the pats to lose. I dont give a rats arse who is coordinating. when you turn the ball over 5 times, your not going to win...
and how Dewayne Parcells is such a football god is beyond me. he has a 57% carerr winning percentage.
BigDFan5 said:Belichick can't win without his coodinators. I give the credit for all the Pats success to Crennel, and Weiss
burmafrd said:Brady had his best year- but he has several games that he stank up the place like he never has had before. He was very consistent before - up and down this year. And by the way- the Cowboys had a bunch on IR as well- and no one seemed to give us the benefit of the doubt like they did NE. BESIDES- what was supposedly their strength? THAT they could PLUG players in anyway you wanted and STILL WIN. GUess that wasn't true after all?
burmafrd said:Brady had his best year- but he has several games that he stank up the place like he never has had before. He was very consistent before - up and down this year. And by the way- the Cowboys had a bunch on IR as well- and no one seemed to give us the benefit of the doubt like they did NE. BESIDES- what was supposedly their strength? THAT they could PLUG players in anyway you wanted and STILL WIN. GUess that wasn't true after all?
BigDFan5 said:Belichick can't win without his coodinators. I give the credit for all the Pats success to Crennel, and Weiss
I'll take that bet.dthahn said:I'm betting they don't make the playoffs either.
Jimmie said:5 turnovers caused the pats to lose. I dont give a rats arse who is coordinating. when you turn the ball over 5 times, your not going to win...
and how Dewayne Parcells is such a football god is beyond me. he has a 57% carerr winning percentage.
exactly.BigDFan5 said:Belichick can't win without his coodinators. I give the credit for all the Pats success to Crennel, and Weiss
Why do you even try?Juke99 said:Statistically, he had his best year as a pro.
I read about how Flozell got hurt and that ruined our season....the Pats have 10 guys on IR.
Jimmie said:so, Belichick is responsible for the player(s) fumbling or Brady throwing INT's? are u ****tin me?