Bledsoe and Romo

[Doomsday101]

Show me a Romo interception? Bledsoe is our Starter and Romo our #2. Henson solidified his role - #3.

Your right Bledsoe,Romo and Henson that is the order but Romo had his ups and downs tonight and he has had his shares of near ints this pre-season. Nothing wrong pulling for the guy but lets not get carried away

 

[Nors]

OMG. Nors IS Babe Laufenburg.

Where do you rank Henson? Did he beat out Romo tonight in the 4th quarter against 4th stringers? throwing 50% and a bad pick called back? You really believe he has earned #2?

I don't see it at all, but factually we will have a #2 announced real soon.

 

[Rack]

What I am wondering is when the play was bein reviewed if NORs was hoping the INT would stand or if it would be overturned. I really serioulsy don not know.

No doubt Nors is actually hoping for Henson to fail just so he can come in here and do some chest thumping.

No doubt whatsoever.

 

[Hostile]

Your right Bledsoe,Romo and Henson that is the order but Romo had his ups and downs tonight and he has had his shares of near ints this pre-season. Nothing wrong pulling for the guy but lets not get carried away

Too late!!!!

If only you'd got here sooner.

 

[Hostile]

Where do you rank Henson? Did he beat out Romo tonight in the 4th quarter against 4th stringers? throwing 50% and a bad pick called back? You really believe he has earned #2?

I don't see it at all, but factually we will have a #2 announced real soon.

There are no "4th stringers" left on any roster.

Where people have the QBs ranked is not the point. No INT. So don't bring it up.

"Be fair," right?

 

[Wolverine]

No doubt Nors is actually hoping for Henson to fail just so he can come in here and do some chest thumping.

No doubt whatsoever.

I agree Rack.

 

[blindzebra]

Where do you rank Henson? Did he beat out Romo tonight in the 4th quarter against 4th stringers? throwing 50% and a bad pick called back? You really believe he has earned #2?

I don't see it at all, but factually we will have a #2 announced real soon.

Have you not been calling for that announcement for 3 weeks?

I just wonder #3 QB leads the team to a win, isn't that just what Parcells said he wants his back up to do?

 

[Nors]

No doubt Nors is actually hoping for Henson to fail just so he can come in here and do some chest thumping.

No doubt whatsoever.

No Romo beat Henson fair and square. The bird chested lack of chest ABLE thumpers should call it a night!

This is all on Henson and Romo - not NORS - LOL

 

[Chief]

Where do you rank Henson? Did he beat out Romo tonight in the 4th quarter against 4th stringers? throwing 50% and a bad pick called back? You really believe he has earned #2?

I don't see it at all, but factually we will have a #2 announced real soon.

Why does this matter so much to you?

You clearly have an agenda. I'm trying to understand why it's so important for you to see Romo named the backup. Obviously, he is. Surely nobody will be surprised when Purcells says it.

 

[Nors]

I agree Rack.

Suprise, Suprise


Wolverine - RIGHT NOW

Rank our QB depth chart and why.

 

[jlust22]

No doubt Romo is the backup QB and should be, but I wouldn't feel entirely comfortable if Bledsoe got hurt and Romo had to start 3 or 4 games in a row. I think he would struggle and his carelessness would come back to bite him with TO's.

 

[Nors]

Why does this matter so much to you?

You clearly have an agenda. I'm trying to understand why it's so important for you to see Romo named the backup. Obviously, he is. Surely nobody will be surprised when Purcells says it.

We agree - thanks

 

[Doomsday101]

This is funny. Bledsoe had a very good night and we are talking about Romo and Henson? Attention Pre-Season is over no one gives a rats ars. This is Bledsoe offense!!!!

 

[Bob Sacamano]

why worry about the backup QBs when Bledsoe never misses any time? well, except for that serious shot to the ribs in '01, I think it just comes with the territory, being the backup QB for the Cowboys, but who am I?

 

[Wolverine]

Suprise, Suprise


Wolverine - RIGHT NOW

Rank our QB depth chart and why.

#1 Bledsoe - duh.

#2 Henson - cuz I know it will p*ss you off I did not list Romo as #2.

#3 Vinny Testeverde - cuz I know it will p*ss you off that I did not even put Romo on the list.

 

[Nors]

Have you not been calling for that announcement for 3 weeks?

I just wonder #3 QB leads the team to a win, isn't that just what Parcells said he wants his back up to do?

You on record Henson beat Romo out tonight? I know you were there and had great insight in person on Henson and how good he was.

That 2-4 effort and a inter recalled surplanted 8-13 Romo 91 yard night?

I'll call you - Romo easily won #2 all camp and today.....

 

[Nors]

#1 Bledsoe - duh.

#2 Henson - cuz I know it will p*ss you off I did not list Romo as #2.

#3 Vinny Testeverde - cuz I know it will p*ss you off that I did not even put Romo on the list.

thats mature and well thought out. Expected as much. Have a great evening :

 

[blindzebra]

You on record Henson beat Romo out tonight? I know you were there and had great insight in person on Henson and how good he was.

That 2-4 effort and a inter recalled surplanted 8-13 Romo 91 yard night?

I'll call you - Romo easily won #2 all camp and today.....

REPOST.

Agenda alert.

 

[Wolverine]

thats mature and well thought out. Expected as much. Have a great evening :

I am not the one who told you to ask me that question. Thats you fault not mine.

 

[optiplex]

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/live/NFL_20050901_JAC@DAL

8/13 91 yards - no interceptions - rough crowd and anti Romo agenda - get that

He's our #2 - CLEARLY.

What about that Henson Int called back? Be fair.....

Ha Ha! Be fair....Be fair! You gotta be kiddin' all of us. You're asking another poster to be fair. I like Romo alot, because he is a Dallas Cowboy. But you make it difficult because you prop him up so much while putting down Henson, who by the way is a Cowboy also. I understand you want the best players on our team, but you can still do that without all the put downs. Or maybe you just consider it constructive criticism.