Bledsoe or McNabb?

[dargonking999]

You have zero clue what a troll comment is. He quoted a post I made, didn't even reply to it, and tried to bait me into a completely different discussion. People usually do that when they can't counter an argument. I'm a troll for pointing that out? Considering his post history, you can't be serious.

I'm sure you think any post made by a Skins fan in this forum is trolling.

No cause if i did i wouldnt' like some of the skin poster, i think the ones that come over here, and call us homer's because your opinion is differnt strikes me as troll, some one of another team comes into a team forum and challenges theposters here because he wants to have some thing to go to ES and show all the Commander fans is a troll, so yes i think you are troll, and your reason for anything you say i relaly ocudl care less about consider another troll IGNORED, Good day

 

[dargonking999]

then let's all put this troll on ignore till he quits trolling.

i'll start - who's with me???? : )

oh!! me! me!, pick me!!!!

*raises hand enthustiaclly while trying to keep from jumping out of his seat*

 

[Gamebreaker]

when you say 104 of 104 voters are HOMERS you're a troll. and if these discussions are not up to your standards, then why be here? IF NOT to start trouble and stir things up in your good jolly little fashion, then what?

you wanna quit being considered a troll, quit taking pot shots and poking 104 fans in the ribs going HUH HUH??? HAHAHAHA!!! HUH HUH???

it's what trolls do.

If there is 104 votes (looks like 108 now), and they all voted for Bledsoe yet there is not one good argument for Bledsoe in a 23 page thread. Then yes, they are all homers.

I even backed my claims up by debunking the pathetic arguments I'd seen on this thread for Bledsoe, and you completely gloss over that. Why? Because you can't think of anything else to defend Bledsoe with.

It's sad, really. Fans of teams should be fans of football first, and not just mindless drones for their team.

 

[iceberg]

If there is 104 votes (looks like 108 now), and they all voted for Bledsoe yet there is not one good argument for Bledsoe in a 23 page thread. Then yes, they are all homers.

I even backed my claims up by debunking the pathetic arguments I'd seen on this thread for Bledsoe, and you completely gloss over that. Why? Because you can't think of anything else to defend Bledsoe with.

It's sad, really. Fans of teams should be fans of football first, and not just mindless drones for their team.

ooooooo look - a button. i want to press it but i know not what it does...

there, now that my TITAN AE quote is in for the day - POOF - troll-b-gone.

 

[The30YardSlant]

If there is 104 votes (looks like 108 now), and they all voted for Bledsoe yet there is not one good argument for Bledsoe in a 23 page thread. Then yes, they are all homers.

I even backed my claims up by debunking the pathetic arguments I'd seen on this thread for Bledsoe, and you completely gloss over that. Why? Because you can't think of anything else to defend Bledsoe with.

It's sad, really. Fans of teams should be fans of football first, and not just mindless drones for their team.

http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/



Washington Commanders fans DEFINE "mindless drones"

 

[iceberg]

http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/



Washington Commanders fans DEFINE "mindless drones"

hey - HH ... let's do something really odd and team up to ignore the troll. : ) feeding them seems to keep them alive, happy, and trolling.

 

[Gamebreaker]

you're not 100% right. 100% right would say that 104 voters were HOMERS as you called them. since we can and do have many objective fans who can put team allegience aside to talk football, and these fans have voted, that statement by default IS NOT 100% right.

You should learn how to read. I specifically said the more sensible members of this forum have voted and made comments about the homers in here, on this very thread. Those posters who put their team's loyalty aside are the ones who voted for the better quarterback, McNabb. I can tell which one you voted for.

like i said dude, the teens only last 7 years. puberty will catch you sooner or later.

You keep trotting out the puberty insult, and it's no more effective than it was when you first used it. Yet I'm the troll who's insulting people? Hypocrite.

 

[Gamebreaker]

then let's all put this troll on ignore till he quits trolling.

i'll start - who's with me???? : )

You have yet to counter my argument that McNabb is better than Bledsoe. Putting me on ignore, which I wouldn't mind since I wouldn't have to waste my time replying your drivel, doesn't make me any less accurate on my stance.

Tell denial I said hello, I'm sure you two are getting well acquianted.

 

[Stash]

A leader gets his team into the playoffs on a regular basis and that's what McNabb does, Bledsoe's leadership can't get his team to the playoffs, despite the fact that he has had a better supporting cast than McNabb his entire career. Did Bledsoe rise to the occasion in Buffalo when he lost to Pittsburgh's backups while playing at home for a playoff spot, did he rise to the occasion against Seattle or is he using the ole, 'if we only had a decent kicker excuse'. Indeed, Bledsoe took the sack in Seattle territory that led to Jose Cortez's miss. He plays well enough against weak defenses, but does not rise to the occasion against good ones. In McNabbs' infamous super bowl choke, he threw for over 300 yards and had 3 td passes while his running game was non-existent, meanwhile the great Tom Brady had Corey Dillon running wild and receiver Deion Branch winning the MVP because he outplayed Brady. The fact that McNabb puts up good numbers with a meager supporting cast tells you that more often than not, he does rise to the occasion which is in stark contrast to Bledsoe.

You shouldn't even bother posting.

Everybody knows your "agenda" around here.

Your name is mud here.

 

[DCBoysfan]

Both QB's today, McNabb is the better QB and I hate the eagles!!

 

[Tass]

You have yet to counter my argument that McNabb is better than Bledsoe.

Allow me to retort:

This entire thread is opinion-based. YOUR opinion is that McNabb is 'Better'. (Better at selling soup and running, sure).

The question asked was NOT "Which is the better QB?" The question is "Which one do you want QBing your team?"

Big difference. My personal opinion is that while McNabb is a better athlete, Bledsoe is a better QB. Now can we leave it at that?

 

[Tass]

Sheesh...whenever a thread gets good the mods banish it from 'The Zone'.

 

[Gamebreaker]

No cause if i did i wouldnt' like some of the skin poster, i think the ones that come over here, and call us homer's because your opinion is differnt strikes me as troll,

There is a difference between opinion and fact. I can have the opinion that I'm a better basketball player than Dwayne Wade. Yeah, that's my opinion. But is it a fact? Hell no it's not a fact. Saying McNabb is a better QB than Bledsoe is not only my opinion, but it's a proven fact by their performances on the field. If you voted for Bledsoe and completely threw what those two bring to the QB position out of the window, then yes it absolutely applies to you.

some one of another team comes into a team forum and challenges theposters here because he wants to have some thing to go to ES and show all the Commander fans is a troll

Please stop making stuff up. I haven't gone over to ES and showed them anything from this thread. But if that is your fear, than it's painfully obvious you know this thread reeks of homerism.

so yes i think you are troll, and your reason for anything you say i relaly ocudl care less about consider another troll IGNORED, Good day

That is hilarious. That whole last sentence just oozes immaturity. You could care less about anything I say, but I'm definitely a troll. Yep. Gotta love that homer logic.

 

[iceberg]

Both QB's today, McNabb is the better QB and I hate the eagles!!

it depends, pure and simple. they seem to have different ways to get to the "end" but in the "end" it's all the same - good but not good enough.

i voted for mcnabb for a few reasons but overall bledsoe is the better "qb" and i hate bledsoe, so this isn't "homer" talking as some children would like you to believe.

when TO went nuts on mcnabb mcnabb had every opportunity to stand up and lead the team - to get TO back onto the field and make it a team gain, not a personal loss.

he didn't. if he can't handle a wild and loud yet talented wr, he's not ever gonna be a "leader" in the sense people want to make him out to be. just not there or he chooses to *not* use it.

NOW - the final reason why i chose bledsoe in the end (i voted mcnabb just to help his #'s and make a point that this poll was useless) is that mcnabb gets hurt more than a cover girls feelings at a dinner party. lobs an INT, suddenly he's limping. if he has to stay in, when he screws up his injury for some reason gets worse.

he's a faker who looks for excuses vs. shouldering the responsiblity of the team upon himself and that just won't get it done in the end. like drew or not he will NOT come out of game unless carried (i hated it but it was for my reasons, not the teams) and he WILL fight to the end.

THAT'S what a "qb" and leader does. mcnabb just looks for a place to hide when the shyte hits the fan. bledsoe will dive into the mess with you with all he has regardless of the overall "success" in the end.

 

[iceberg]

Sheesh...whenever a thread gets good the mods banish it from 'The Zone'.

well, with it in here i'll dive back in again. in the "main zone" most don't wanna go through this crap but it's where people like us have fun. : )

 

[iceberg]

You should learn how to read. I specifically said the more sensible members of this forum have voted and made comments about the homers in here, on this very thread. Those posters who put their team's loyalty aside are the ones who voted for the better quarterback, McNabb. I can tell which one you voted for.

you should learn how to comprehend what YOU say - as in:


Originally Posted by Gamebreaker
So far, there are 104 hopeless homers who've voted in this thread. Anyone else want to come out the closet?

you didn't make this "seperation" early on yet now you run to it like mcnabb to a limp after a roy williams INT of his gimp arse.

 

[Gamebreaker]

Allow me to retort:

This entire thread is opinion-based. YOUR opinion is that McNabb is 'Better'. (Better at selling soup and running, sure).

The question asked was NOT "Which is the better QB?" The question is "Which one do you want QBing your team?"

Big difference. My personal opinion is that while McNabb is a better athlete, Bledsoe is a better QB. Now can we leave it at that?

I wouldn't say the entire thread is opinion based, some people brought some stats to the table.

Regardless, this thread turned into "which is the better QB?" awfully fast and way before I ever entered it. Furthermore, why wouldn't you want the best quarterback at a position behind center of your team?

McNabb's athleticism is part of the reason he's the better QB. It's not as if he relies on it, like Mike Vick.

 

[Gamebreaker]

you should learn how to comprehend what YOU say - as in:


Originally Posted by Gamebreaker
So far, there are 104 hopeless homers who've voted in this thread. Anyone else want to come out the closet?

you didn't make this "seperation" early on yet now you run to it like mcnabb to a limp after a roy williams INT of his gimp arse.

You STILL haven't comprehended what I said. While you were going back looking through my post, you definitely skipped over the one that talked about the more objective forum members here. Do yourself a favor and find it yourself before I have to repost it for you.

Also, I'm glad you finally decided to talk about the actual topic, and not irrelevant troll talk that only plays as a distraction to the real issue.

I'll be away from my computer for a couple of hours, but I'll I have a counter argument to your above post on McNabb/Bledsoe when I get back.

 

[Tass]

I wouldn't say the entire thread is opinion based, some people brought some stats to the table.

Regardless, this thread turned into "which is the better QB?" awfully fast and way before I ever entered it. Furthermore, why wouldn't you want the best quarterback at a position behind center of your team?

I can't control what others turned the thread into, I'm just telling you what my intent was when I started the thread.

As to your question, once again that is your opinion. I DO want the better quarterback under center and in my opinion that is Bledsoe. But even if I thought McNabb was a better QB I might not want him for other reasons. Kind of like TO. He is an awesome WR but I'd rather have Chad Johnson or Hines Ward on my team. It's not SOLELY about their talent...I measure intangibles as well.

 

[ZeroClub]

I like Bledsoe, his leadership, and the way he carries himself.

But given the question marks at OL, McNabb's mobility would be a major plus for this offense.

Advantage McNabb.