toto1939
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,057
- Reaction score
- 1,080
Yep...Dak was all over the place with getting his team up and down all parts of Lambeau Field including the endzone.He's correct. Dak was all over the place yesterday.
Yep...Dak was all over the place with getting his team up and down all parts of Lambeau Field including the endzone.He's correct. Dak was all over the place yesterday.
Well, I posted a thread with a bunch of tweets by him a few weeks ago where he broke down Dak's performance against somebody and he followed the tweets up with a full article.Even if he is right (which is debatable) so what? What makes him any different than some random Zoner with an opinion? Why does some blogger rate his own thread (started by someone other than him, no less) touting his opinion?
Well, I posted a thread with a bunch of tweets by him a few weeks ago. He's pretty well-respected in the NFL community, tho I'm still unsure as to who he is. Either way, whenever I see someone do a whole twitter timeline discussing the Cowboys, I try to share.
Sorry, you don't appreciate it.
Thanks for the post. Should also be pointed out that Fahey has been very effusive with Dak praise and analysis in previous weeks.Well, I posted a thread with a bunch of tweets by him a few weeks ago. He's pretty well-respected in the NFL community, tho I'm still unsure as to who he is. Either way, whenever I see someone do a whole twitter timeline discussing the Cowboys, I try to share.
Sorry, you don't appreciate it.
I swear, some people would complain if you hanged them with a brand new rope.
Ummm, dak wasn't good for the better part of 2 quarters...collected himself and put together a much better second half on the road
And this is a negative?
Yeah, I don't think so
Nobody plays great for 4 quarters every single game...of course Dak is going to have rough patches
Wow you would think that we lost this game by 2 TDs instead of the other way around. He's a rookie playing on the road at Lambeau. He will have more games like this but you have to love how he finished the game.
This is what I know.. Weird to see the criticism.Thanks for the post. Should also be pointed out that Fahey has been very effusive with Dak praise and analysis in previous weeks.
Im sorry but I dont care what his completion percentage was. Rodgers was really bad. He missed his wrs multiple times, I saw him throw the ball too high, too low and behind his recievers. He also looked bad while fumbling the ball multiple times. I really think something is wrong with him. The fact they were comparing his last 8 games of 2015 to Johnny Football and Manziel actually had better numbers should be disturbing for any packer fan.
I think it has to do with the talent around him eroding.Rodgers throws look all over the place. I haven't watched him but apparently it's been going on for about a year. Some of the Green Bay fans are already looking to get rid of him. Pretty funny reading it on their forums.
I don't know how it can be Dak's worst game if he threw 3 TDs and the team still won. The point is to lead the team to win the game. Yeah, he missed badly on some throws and was late on others. Do people forget he's a rookie? I guess he's raised standards with his own play: a double edged sword.
I do want to see this team with Romo at the helm despite Dak playing great which isn't the question. The question is whether Romo can make the team even better with his play and experience. Lineham seems to be calling great plays and if Romo can still be the Romo of 2014 and stay injury free, this team is a legitimate SB contender.
Imo it was Daks worst game, I have not seen him miss open guys like this Even in preseason.he was rushing his throws for no reason.
Rodgers throws look all over the place. I haven't watched him but apparently it's been going on for about a year. Some of the Green Bay fans are already looking to get rid of him. Pretty funny reading it on their forums.
Imo it was Daks worst game, I have not seen him miss open guys like this Even in preseason.he was rushing his throws for no reason.