Board Wiped Out Mock

The Realist

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,504
Reaction score
2,027
LB’s, JJ, OL, WR’s gone. I believe Philly got Lloyd, Green and Lindy. Best players on the board for us were Hill, Walker and Penning.

1) Daxton Hill FS
2) Ed Ingram OG (traded down)
3a) George Pickens WR
3b) John Ridgeway DT
5a) Leo Chenal LB
5b) DeAngelo Malone DE
7) Dylan Parham G/C
 
LB’s, JJ, OL, WR’s gone. I believe Philly got Lloyd, Green and Lindy. Best players on the board for us were Hill, Walker and Penning.

1) Daxton Hill FS
2) Ed Ingram OG (traded down)
3a) George Pickens WR
3b) John Ridgeway DT
5a) Leo Chenal LB
5b) DeAngelo Malone DE
7) Dylan Parham G/C
I think Hill would be a big upgrade over what we had at FS. Pretty versatile too. Im not as concerned with the mediocre ball production as I would have been in years. TO production isnt a problem we need to fix now
 
Huge fans of Hill and Pickens. So I’m good with this
 
I think Hill would be a big upgrade over what we had at FS. Pretty versatile too. Im not as concerned with the mediocre ball production as I would have been in years. TO production isnt a problem we need to fix now

You see him as Kearse replacement or Kazee/Hooker replacement who plays with Kearse?
 
You see him as Kearse replacement or Kazee/Hooker replacement who plays with Kearse?
Kazee / Hooker.

He either plays slot or up top. Kearse or Wilson will play SS.

We likely bring back Kearse and Hooker
 
I’d take Zion Johnson or a DE rather than Hill

have to remember that there are only 23 picks before 24
 
I’d take Zion Johnson or a DE rather than Hill

have to remember that there are only 23 picks before 24

Can you legitimately say that Zion and JJ are graded higher than Hill or are they even close?
 
I’m torn on Hill as almost everything I’ve seen is him playing slot CB…

Brugler is high on him though so I’d trust it…

This would be a solid draft IMO.
 
You see him as Kearse replacement or Kazee/Hooker replacement who plays with Kearse?
Kazee/Hooker. He is an FS to me. More comparable skill set wise to Jevon Holland than Kearse in that he can cover the slot as a CB. Better in run support than Holland, but Holland has much better ball skills
 
Kazee/Hooker. He is an FS to me. More comparable skill set wise to Jevon Holland than Kearse in that he can cover the slot as a CB. Better in run support than Holland, but Holland has much better ball skills

The Byron Jones of safeties. I could see him being good to very good, but not disappointed if he leaves for huge money due to lack of ball skills. Hopefully he has them but just hasn’t displayed them yet.
 
LB’s, JJ, OL, WR’s gone. I believe Philly got Lloyd, Green and Lindy. Best players on the board for us were Hill, Walker and Penning.

1) Daxton Hill FS
2) Ed Ingram OG (traded down)
3a) George Pickens WR
3b) John Ridgeway DT
5a) Leo Chenal LB
5b) DeAngelo Malone DE
7) Dylan Parham G/C
I dont mind this draft at all. IMO the 2nd round becomes a must for LG
 
Can you legitimately say that Zion and JJ are graded higher than Hill or are they even close?

he has a “back of the first round grade”

Not that different than JJ and Zion

so yes, they’re close

factor in the impact of OC and DE and I’d rather go with one of them
 
he has a “back of the first round grade”

Not that different than JJ and Zion

so yes, they’re close

factor in the impact of OC and DE and I’d rather go with one of them

Hill doesn’t have a back end of first round grade. According to who?
 
Hill doesn’t have a back end of first round grade. According to who?

SI.com says “back half of first rd”

NFL.com gives a 6.33 grade “quality starter within first 2 seasons”

The Draftnetwork says “second round value”

I could go on but it’s getting boring
 
LB’s, JJ, OL, WR’s gone. I believe Philly got Lloyd, Green and Lindy. Best players on the board for us were Hill, Walker and Penning.

1) Daxton Hill FS
2) Ed Ingram OG (traded down)
3a) George Pickens WR
3b) John Ridgeway DT
5a) Leo Chenal LB
5b) DeAngelo Malone DE
7) Dylan Parham G/C

Love what you did considering your board was wiped out.
 
SI.com says “back half of first rd”

NFL.com gives a 6.33 grade “quality starter within first 2 seasons”

The Draftnetwork says “second round value”

I could go on but it’s getting boring

Oh, would have thought one would want to use quality sources. 2nd round value. Ha. You and I know if we draft Dax at 24 he’s starting from day one.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,942
Messages
13,906,270
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top