Bobby Carpenter Progress thread:

fffiasco

Active Member
Messages
833
Reaction score
163
According to Espn's box score Carp had 3 Solo tackles. I don't remember him giving up any pass plays on 3rd down.

Discuss.
 

sureletsrace

Official CZ Homer
Messages
4,622
Reaction score
4,197
I noticed two very solid plays back-to-back by Carpenter, and a tackle on special teams.

He had a very, very nice open-field tackle one-on-one that would have likely been 6 for Tampa had he whiffed.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
He had a solid game from what I could tell, though obviously judging ILBs takes a much closer look.
 

CowboyMike

Stay Thirsty, My Friends
Messages
5,448
Reaction score
669
Yeah, he was good here and there, but a lot of the big runs were partly due to his lack of power taking on the blocks. The big 35 yarder by Cadillac was a busted assignment by Carpenter. The leap over TD by Ward could have been his stop too. He leap and met him in mid air, but got knocked back instead of being the bigger hitter and driving him backwards.

He also laid down on the Cadillac TD on the goal line, tripping up Brooking in the process.

So all in all, good pass coverage and open field stuff by Carpenter today, but sorry in the box run defending.
 

jchap

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,288
Reaction score
1,821
He made some key special team tackles. Finally I see that first round pick was well spent. Thanks Bill!
 

Vertigo_17

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,278
Reaction score
56
Carp played OK IMO, but he will most likely be getting a fine for the hit in Leftwich below the knee. Not dirty, but still illegal.
 

CowboyManDan

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,792
Reaction score
441
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
One thing I did notice...was that Carpenter was in the goal line defense. It was right after the challenged TD was reversed and then the Bucs ran the next play in for the TD. My question is: What the heck is a "finesse" linebacker doing in the goal line package?!
 

tunahelper

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,684
Reaction score
2,156
CowboyMike;2938901 said:
Yeah, he was good here and there, but a lot of the big runs were partly due to his lack of power taking on the blocks. The big 35 yarder by Cadillac was a busted assignment by Carpenter. The leap over TD by Ward could have been his stop too. He leap and met him in mid air, but got knocked back instead of being the bigger hitter and driving him backwards.

He also laid down on the Cadillac TD on the goal line, tripping up Brooking in the process.

So all in all, good pass coverage and open field stuff by Carpenter today, but sorry in the box run defending.

Wade had the defense in a nickel on 2nd down. After Tampa ran the ball down our throat. I was wondering waht Wade was thinking Tampa was going to do on 2nd down?
 

Bluestang

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,161
Reaction score
1,583
because Jason Williams is hurt...I guarantee Carp is a bandage right now for certain packages - he may be the nickel guy but he is filling for Jason Williams' roles.
 

CowboyMike

Stay Thirsty, My Friends
Messages
5,448
Reaction score
669
tunahelper;2938942 said:
Wade had the defense in a nickel on 2nd down. After Tampa ran the ball down our throat. I was wondering waht Wade was thinking Tampa was going to do on 2nd down?

Because the nickel is not only for 3rd down. The nickel is a defense for 3 WR sets. So if Tampa marches out 3 WRs, then we're going to match their personnel with the nickel package.

If we keep our base D out there, then you'd have a LB or Safety covering a WR instead of a CB. Would you rather have Spencer lining up across a WR on 2nd down or Scandrick?
 

tunahelper

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,684
Reaction score
2,156
CowboyMike;2938975 said:
Because the nickel is not only for 3rd down. The nickel is a defense for 3 WR sets. So if Tampa marches out 3 WRs, then we're going to match their personnel with the nickel package.

How did that work? My point was when a team is running through you like a hot knife you should not put the nickel in on 2nd down against their standard set. Bad call.
 

Bluestang

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,161
Reaction score
1,583
tunahelper;2938984 said:
How did that work? My point was when a team is running through you like a hot knife you should not put the nickel in on 2nd down against their standard set. Bad call.


because if they see that LB match-up they will pass the ball...are you really serious asking this question? Base D vs 3WR set you will lose that battle all day....Geez....
 

tunahelper

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,684
Reaction score
2,156

tunahelper

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,684
Reaction score
2,156
theogt;2939101 said:
That's not a nickel.

That's a 3-3-5, with a run blitz.

I guess if you say Ware running late before the snap to lineup on RE standing up is 3-3-5 or 4-2? The point is being made that failing to match up with base personel was not the best choice, since we were not slowing their running game. Especially when some stated they we in a 3WR set not base offense.
 

Bluestang

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,161
Reaction score
1,583
tunahelper;2939062 said:
Ok, here is a link proving a TE is in motioning with base personel group of 2WR's/2 TE's against our nickel and the result was the 35 yard run. Around 38 second mark.

Thanks!

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d812929a0/WK-1-Cadillac-Williams-Highlights


I think the nickel was in to maybe get a DB on Kellen Winslow, but if you look more closely in that play they beat the blitz by Alan Ball(not sure who that was) If that blitzer took a better angle to the inside he would had a shot to get the RB down. Also BC showed why he's isn't a starter in this defense...he couldn't shed his block.
 
Top