Bobby Carpenter

Yeagermeister;1087336 said:
The only player I would have traded up for was D'Brickashaw and I would take Cutler over Lienart....more upside and athletic.

If I had the first pick in the draft I would have taken D'Brickshaw. (Yes, even over Reggie Bush) Next I would have taken Cutler.
 
I wanted us to trade up for Matt Leinart which means we wouldn't have had Carpenter or Fasano, which woiuld not be a great loss IMO. I assume we would have had to throw in a pick in next year's draft as well but probably not a 1st.

As for Leinart vs Cutler, I'd take Leinart every time. He has much more of the "intangibles" than Cutler IMO and is more NFL ready. That said, I wouldn't have been all that upset if we would have gotten Cutler either.
 
Who is Bobby Carpenter??

Heck, I thought we were still searching for Bobby Fischer.....now this Carpenter guy......
 
I would have attempted a trade out of the 1st round completely, then I would have taken:

2. Winston Justice OT
2. Bobby Carpenter....If he was gone, then Brodie Croyle QB
3. Ko Simpson FS
 
Pabst;1086941 said:
Maybe it's just me, but I kinda like it when the first round pick isn't an immediate starter. Shows the team has, ya know... talent and depth.

Yes, enough talent and depth to be a .500 team heading nowhere fast as long as the QB keeps getting destroyed. LT....I agree with BARRYRAY.
 
theebs;1086975 said:
You do realize that winston justice has been inactive every week for philly right???? lol, you would be calling him a bust if were here too.

i dont think justice would be inactive in dallas..he'd be starting
 
someone just said we should have draft John McCargo, a 1-gap, 4-3 DT

this thread has gone to hell
 
I'm still mad about not drafting Tom Brady in 2000. I mean we picked Mario Edwards instead !!
 
summerisfunner;1087744 said:
someone just said we should have draft John McCargo, a 1-gap, 4-3 DT

this thread has gone to hell

Even worse, the guy was 3rd round talent.

I would complain about the stupidity of the suggestion, but really I'm just happy to see that Larry Lacewell finally got DSL hooked up at his Arkansas retirement home.
 
Is it really that hard to look at the Carpenter situation rationally?

Here are the simple truths:

1. It's disappointing that Carpenter hasn't performed well enough to force the Cowboys to play him more.

2. He does have the disadvantage of playing a position that is stronger than the team likely expected it to be, however being a first round draft choice it would be nice to see him at least in the mix.

3. He's just a rookie, and all players don't progress at the same pace. He still has time to prove himself.

BOTTOM LINE: He may eventually be successful and he may fail - there is no definitive answer at this point.


Is there anything here to dispute? At least for reasonable people (HINT - anyone that claims to know exactly and with certainty how Carpenter will turn out are not "reasonable").
 
Stautner;1088162 said:
Is it really that hard to look at the Carpenter situation rationally?

Here are the simple truths:

1. It's disappointing that Carpenter hasn't performed well enough to force the Cowboys to play him more.

2. He does have the disadvantage of playing a position that is stronger than the team likely expected it to be, however being a first round draft choice it would be nice to see him at least in the mix.

3. He's just a rookie, and all players don't progress at the same pace. He still has time to prove himself.

BOTTOM LINE: He may eventually be successful and he may fail - there is no definitive answer at this point.


Is there anything here to dispute? At least for reasonable people (HINT - anyone that claims to know exactly and with certainty how Carpenter will turn out are not "reasonable").

That makes sense. You have to stop posting now, sorry.
 
He'll be alright in two years when Ellis is on the verge of retirment
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,453
Messages
13,875,700
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top