CouchCoach
Staff member
- Messages
- 41,122
- Reaction score
- 74,964
But back then, the movement from TV to film was not an easy one and he would be more interested in the exposure and pay off played into it and while they were known commodities across the pond, the US is where the money was and is. And I agree, whoever it is should be English or Australian.I think Lazenby is the only Bond who fit cleanly within the 'unknown' category. The Bond films are British based. Connery, Moore, Craig and even Dalton had done enough in their home market to be known commodities. I am old enough to remember Moore as The Saint, which is a reason why I initially enjoyed his casting as the new Bond at the time. Brosnan was well-known (in my opinion) on both sides of the Atlantic. Americans certainly loved him as Remington Steele before he became 007.
And while I have a hard time seeing a female 007, Garner was pretty good in Elektra and Peppermint and Theron in Aeon Flux. So, they cast it right and give some early Bond twists to her and make her a manizer, might be really interesting. Just don't have her drinking Cosmos and worrying about breaking a nail.
And they haven't said they're moving that direction but they do feel this franchise has run it's course. And just think of the parties of women that would be flocking to see one of their own playing the role replacing the biggest womanizer in film history. They get opening crowds like Wonder Woman got and the success of Captain Marvel won't be lost on them. And the publicity they would get with a female 007 would be better than they could buy.