jterrell
Penguinite
- Messages
- 33,874
- Reaction score
- 15,971
The problem with TCU is they did not do enough to prove themselves as a top 4 team. The Big 12 was incredibly weak this year and TCU's only important game was a loss at Baylor. I think TCU might be the best team right now, but their best two wins were against #11 Kansas State and #25 Minnesota. The four teams that made it had more wins against top 25 opponents.
We can talk about scores, but trying to use transitivite properties (TCU beat OkSt by 60 and FSU won by 2 therefore TCU is better) is futile. A&M just beat West Virginia by 8 and TCU won by 1, we all know the Aggies are an average team that would lose to TCU.
TCU should probably be in the playoffs, but the Big 12 has to get better if they want it to happen. OkSt, Texas, Kansas St, and Texas Tech played against quality Power 5 opponents during the regular season and lost. They have to continue to play those games and win to lift their own teams up and knock the other conferences down.
But Ole Miss was overrated. They won against Alabama but lost to Auburn, LSU, and Arkansas. West Virginia beat Baylor but lost to Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansas St. Virginia Tech beat Ohio State but lost to Wake Forest. The point here is one huge win doesn't suddenly make a team great. Ole Miss had a great year but are probably third or fourth best if they play in the Big 12.
The Big 12 was not incredibly weak, it was simply down because the brand name schools had QB issues.
It was the 3rd strongest conf this year.
Ohio State beat Minny, MichSt and Wisc.
TCU beat KST, Minny.
The common opponent was Minny and TCU waxed them while OSU just got by them.
But what's more is the loss column. TCU lost to a top 10 team on the road in a miracle late comeback with a couple questionable calls.
OSU lost a HOME Game to an unranked opponent that would shut anyone out of title talk in any prior year.
In fact if Baylor has ONE more loss, TCU probably gets the nod and goes in over OSU.
The committee basically admitted they looked better and had them ranked higher until forcing Baylor in over TCU as head to head came about once conf champs were decided. (Big 12 basically named Baylor champs without doing so)
Baylor didn't play a P5 non-conf game and thus had no argument but TCU should have been in.
The entire SEC was overrated. That happens every year now it seems. A team ranked 20th beats a team ranked 6th and they both end up top 10 the next week....
It is absurd. And the non-conf and Bowl games the past TWO seasons have detailed that.
None of the schools consistently play more than 1 p5 non-conf game. All they can do is keep doing that.
But the critical piece is to expand the playoff and get enough teams in so we truly find out who is the champ.
Once that happens you don't need to guess.