TCU is without a doubt one of the best 4 teams in the country.
What's said is the committee knew that.
They had them 3 and only moved them down once politics and money came into play.
So way a team should win by 40 but move down 2 spots... that's absurd.
Especially when one of the teams who passed it won by 2 versus a team TCU beat by 60+.
But it is a great way to start staking a claim for next year.
TCU probably finishes the year ranked 3rd.
Ole Miss wasn't much overrated. They beat Bama and have a 5 star laden talent pool.
TCU was just much, much better.
The problem with TCU is they did not do enough to prove themselves as a top 4 team. The Big 12 was incredibly weak this year and TCU's only important game was a loss at Baylor. I think TCU might be the best team right now, but their best two wins were against #11 Kansas State and #25 Minnesota. The four teams that made it had more wins against top 25 opponents.
We can talk about scores, but trying to use transitivite properties (TCU beat OkSt by 60 and FSU won by 2 therefore TCU is better) is futile. A&M just beat West Virginia by 8 and TCU won by 1, we all know the Aggies are an average team that would lose to TCU.
TCU should probably be in the playoffs, but the Big 12 has to get better if they want it to happen. OkSt, Texas, Kansas St, and Texas Tech played against quality Power 5 opponents during the regular season and lost. They have to continue to play those games and win to lift their own teams up and knock the other conferences down.
But Ole Miss was overrated. They won against Alabama but lost to Auburn, LSU, and Arkansas. West Virginia beat Baylor but lost to Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansas St. Virginia Tech beat Ohio State but lost to Wake Forest. The point here is one huge win doesn't suddenly make a team great. Ole Miss had a great year but are probably third or fourth best if they play in the Big 12.