News: BR: Cowboys' Ezekiel Elliott Falls out of ESPN's Top 10 RB Rankings Voted by NFL Insiders

SteveTheCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,133
Reaction score
17,119
Whatever you apologists may think, running and catching are the two most important skills of a back. Thats why they call them "running" backs. :thumbup:

Blocking backs are called fullbacks.

You think they pay Zeke 18 million for his blocking abilities? :lmao::lmao2:
In large part yes. They can't make an o line since fredbeard left. And Tony can't take that punishment.
If you like Dak you should be gratefull. Instead you whine incessantly like an ignored poodle.
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,419
Reaction score
32,809
I was a big fan of Zeke's in college and was wishing the Cowboys had a chance to draft him. And they did.
I bucked the naysayers saying Zeke shouldn't have been taken as the fourth overall pick. We should have selected Jalen Ramsey instead.
Zeke's first year, the Cowboys' selection looked like a stroke of genius. Many thought Dak and Zeke would be tearing up the league for years.
But after that ...
Zeke has hit a decline, and, quite frankly, while I hope he will rebound, running backs rarely get better with age.
And with the contract Zeke signed a few years ago, I don't know if he can ever rekindle that fire.
So, I admit. I was wrong.
We should have taken Ramsey.
No, I don't rue we didn't.
Just admitting that maybe Zeke wasn't the right pick.
Very disappointed in Zeke.
Very.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
How are you going to regulate how I gauge the RB position? I look long term instead of being short sighted. So that fact that you tried to get me to stop thinking long term means you see the flaws in your train of thought. How good can a RB be if he has no chance of making it into the Hall of Fame. Barkley has HOF talent, but he also has injury problems. So how good is Barkley, really?

So if you want to gauge RB's without thinking about the HOF that's you. But don't sit here and act like I've cheated.

So what is your point? He used to be good? I have to agree with you there. :thumbup:
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
82,588
Reaction score
103,905
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Anemic Zeke will continue to handicap our offense as long as he keeps getting more touches than Pollard.

12-31 in the playoffs vs SF. A complete non-factor. Useless. Dak was our leading rusher that day.

9 yard long run for Zeke...Pollard, 4 -14 with an 8 yard long run...
So 11-22 vs. 3-6.... if removing the long runs.
Be fair about it.
 

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,612
Reaction score
17,986
9 yard long run for Zeke...Pollard, 4 -14 with an 8 yard long run...
So 11-22 vs. 3-6.... if removing the long runs.
Be fair about it.
You’re the one who’s not being fair.

Zeke had more than twice as many carries and they had the same number of “long runs”, so that’s still advantage: Pollard.

If Pollard was the one with 12 carries instead of Zeke, maybe he breaks one of them for 40. There’s no debate as to which RB is more explosive.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
82,588
Reaction score
103,905
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
You’re the one who’s not being fair.

Zeke had more than twice as many carries and they had the same number of “long runs”, so that’s still advantage: Pollard.

If Pollard was the one with 12 carries instead of Zeke, maybe he breaks one of them for 40. There’s no debate as to which RB is more explosive.

Average is what many Zeke dislikers trot out there against him, so now it can't be used against Pollard?
:facepalm:
Typical double standards.

Zeke could have busted one for 40 as well with more carries also.
 

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,612
Reaction score
17,986
Average is what many Zeke dislikers trot out there against him, so now it can't be used against Pollard?
:facepalm:
Typical double standards.

Zeke could have busted one for 40 as well with more carries also.
What are you talking about?

Zeke averaged 1 “long run” in 12 carries, Pollard averaged 1 “long run” in 5 carries... advantage: Pollard.

Zeke averaged 2.6 yards/carry that day, Pollard averaged 4.4 yards/carry that day... advantage: Pollard.

How do the “averages” hurt Pollard?
:laugh:
 

starfan1

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,529
Reaction score
12,623
He ate, partied and Cabo’d his way out of the HOF. Guy had a rookie year for the ages and has been declining since.

I was incredibly impressed in 16 but i also know we could have plugged in literally any back to get similar numbers. 14-18 was definately the Olines best years. Hope they have done enough to shore up the problems.
 
Last edited:

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
82,588
Reaction score
103,905
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
What are you talking about?

Zeke averaged 1 “long run” in 12 carries, Pollard averaged 1 “long run” in 5 carries... advantage: Pollard.

Zeke averaged 2.6 yards/carry that day, Pollard averaged 4.4 yards/carry that day... advantage: Pollard.

How do the “averages” hurt Pollard?
:laugh:

I did not say they hurt Pollard.
I said remove the long runs and they were the same. But yet Zeke's run was longer than Pollards.

Your beloved Pollard was not a difference maker that day either.
 

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,612
Reaction score
17,986
I did not say they hurt Pollard.
I said remove the long runs and they were the same. But yet Zeke's run was longer than Pollards.

Your beloved Pollard was not a difference maker that day either.
“Average is what many Zeke dislikers trot out there against him, so now it can't be used against Pollard?“

How can one use the numbers you provided... against Pollard and not against Zeke?

If anything, you made Zeke look even worse. Pollard had 8 fewer carries and only 17 fewer yards.

Removing each of their “long runs” means you’re removing 25% of Pollard’s carries and only 8% of Zeke’s carries.

Zeke was trash.
:laugh:
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
82,588
Reaction score
103,905
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
“Average is what many Zeke dislikers trot out there against him, so now it can't be used against Pollard?“

How can one use the numbers you provided... against Pollard and not against Zeke?

If anything, you made Zeke look even worse. Pollard had 8 fewer carries and only 17 fewer yards.

Removing each of their “long runs” means you’re removing 25% of Pollard’s carries and only 8% of Zeke’s carries.

Zeke was trash.
:laugh:

Whatever, but you are wrong. Done wasting my time with you on this.
 
Top