Okay, believe what you want.
You should know that that will go over everyone's head. Fail on a nuanced level.Garrett can't make even the most simple of adjustments. Against the Eagles, even a child can see that Garrett should have healed Tyron and Sean Lee at halftime and brought Zeke off the suspension list for the 3rd Quarter. How does this guy keep his job?
It is a matter of practicality. There simply is not enough time to make meaningful changes. And if there is...then there is that same amount of time and more to make changes during the game.
It's a matter of practicality. You have 12 minutes.
Did you even READ the article you linked in your OP? The answer to your question is in there.
By the way, there’s another of those “ex-player turned announcers” quoted as saying he’s never seen wholesale adjustments made at halftime.
So what you're saying is that sometimes there is only so much you can do when your players cannot win individual matchups even if you put them in favorable situations, even when you limit your offensive options to offer them additional help and even if that makes you predictable and easier to defend?
So it's not as simple as to say "just make an adjustment" in a game you're winning 9-7 at halftime?
It makes me wonder sometimes about all the people complaining if they've ever played organized ball before. Sometimes talent just beats strategy when you're facing superior players or when your talent doesn't show up.
But I get it. It's easier to say we are a coaching move away form the Superbowl rather than saying hey we need to continue to improve the roster because we have obvious holes and some depth concerns behind really important players.
I'm laughing at you.
look who our President isI can’t fathom how anyone can still be defending this coaching staff, particularly Garrett. Am I the only one who watch the Falcons game and saw Green manhandled over and over and over and the team never make the slightest bit of adjustment? That’s coaching. Period.
Which of my statements do you disagree with? I said he was given significant help. I also said that even the best pass rushers cannot be doubled every single play nor can one man be given help on every single play. Do you agree or disagree?
Furthermore I asked another question considering in all the games we have won this season we have won the 2nd half did we make adjustments in those games or did the other team not make adjustments? I'm just trying to understand where people stand on the issue.
look who our President is
nothing will amaze me again about the stupidity of the average person
That begs the question, why after 8 years on the job under Jason Garrett is the roster so talent deficient?
Unless Jason Garrett is just a glorified cheerleader and has no say in personnel at all, isn't he responsible for the players he puts on the field?
I don't know about that. If anything its a failure in pro scouting. Chaz Green played well last year. He was competent at OG this season. Does he now suck and can never come back to that. Is that really on Garrett or is on the pro scout and the position coach?
LB talent is problematic but we have depth at a lot of other positions like LB, RB, S, DL, and WR. There is a reality to roster construction in the free agent era and sometimes **** happens.
And of course if you really want to replace Garrett who do you want to replace him. And keep in mind that said coach needs to be able to function in this environment that is according to conventional wisdom so dysfunctional.
Can you give some specific examples of how they adjusted and some on where/how we did not so I can better understand the adjustment argument?Do Green Bay and Atlanta really have that much more talent on the field? The Eagles I'll give you, and the second half curb stomping we took that game supports this. But I believe a bit more adjustments to what was happening on the field could have saved us the GB game and made the Atlanta game competitive.
I’ve heard arguments from some that say you just can’t change a weeks worth of protection plans at the beginning of that game. Timing etc. would be off.Dude, we are talking about the difference between the Atlanta game and the Philly game. Why do you think Jerry said mid-week that they were unprepared for the wide 9, but they had a much better plan for their blocking scheme against Philly.
If there was nothing wrong with how they blocked against Atlanta, why the need to change the scheme? So what did they do?
In the Philly game, it was totally different. They left TEs in on almost every play lined outside the LT, they had a RB to chip or help block lined up behind the LT almost every play, they tilted the line blocking to the left, they rolled the pocket to the right several times, they changed the entire blocking scheme like Jerry said.
So the question becomes, why were these adjustments not made DURING THE ATLANTA game?
Well it could have been worse!look who our President is
nothing will amaze me again about the stupidity of the average person
Today on Talkin' Cowboys Bryan Broaddus laughed at this theory that the Cowboys coaching staff has a halftime adjustment problem. He said that's what "know-it-all" fans that really don't know anything say when they can't come up with any other explanation. I agree with him. Fans aren't even half as smart about NFL football as they think they are.
that in the end is always your excuse. That we might get worse. Well WHERE are we NOW? Are we SUPERBOWL CONTENDERS?
SO what do we really have to lose that we have NOT HAD THE LAST 20 YEARS?