I LOVE ME SOME ME!
Benched
- Messages
- 882
- Reaction score
- 0
PullMyFinger;2793891 said:Yep those TO lovers cease to amaze me sometimes. Like he's the greatest WR to ever play. And RW is the worst.
You are half right in your assumption.
PullMyFinger;2793891 said:Yep those TO lovers cease to amaze me sometimes. Like he's the greatest WR to ever play. And RW is the worst.
Hostile;2791723 said:I'll do whatever I wish within the rules. You're welcome.
Prediction: Williams will have a better week 1 and a better 2009. On top of this the Cowboys will have a better record and go further.
I LOVE ME SOME ME!;2791780 said:That very well may have been the right decision. But getting Roy Williams to be his replacement is down right awful. You cant tell me Arizona would'nt have gave up Anquan Boldin at that price this offseason. I dont believe that.
I LOVE ME SOME ME!;2791828 said:And you better believe Deanglo Hall who may have got toasted by Owens is going to be all up in Roys grill. Will Roy back down? Who the hell knows. Thats my problem with the guy. I know for damn sure Boldin would'nt back down from that joke of a cb. Cory Webster is a damn good cb now for some reason. Dude has guarded TO and all recievers the Giants have faced very good. For some reason people think Ross is better but anyway hes another physical corner who is going to get up in Roys grill. We will see what Roy is made of thats for sure. I just see alot of Pau Gasol in that guy.
Apollo Creed;2791835 said:I have two friends, one a huge Longhorns fan - and the other was born in Detroit. Every game, I get a text - 'I told you so.' I really think our scouting department dropped the ball on the Roy trade. I'd rather have 3 extra bodies in camp - a 1st, 3rd, and 6th. And all that cap space - 5 years 45 million. Wouldn't necessarily mean we'd have to had kept Owens, just not given up an arm and a leg for an inconsistent WR.
If I were you, I'd do a user name/avatar change. You don't want everything you post to be about one player that is no longer on our team. I liked Owens a lot but I'm still a Cowboys fan. Just a thought.
I LOVE ME SOME ME!;2791864 said:I would add the Giant playoff game too. I dont care how many people bring up Craytons "give up play" even when god Tony said it was a miscommunication. If you are going to praise the qb for wins then blame him for the losses too. No more excuses in 09.
And i dont like what Tony represents. He is a guy who went from an unknown to now being Hollywood. He wants to enjoy all the perks that go with the job but when the scrutiny comes he acts like a little girl. Like not talking to Marshall Faulk because he spoke the truth about him. smh. I dont like what he represent from the standpoint of........
When we have a bad quarter or he makes a bad play he comes to the bench acting like his dog just died. What big time championship qb has EVER done that? I dont want to hear about how hes learning or any of that bs. Even as rookies, championship qbs dont go back to the bench with their heads down acting like they are crying in the middle of a damn game. The team looks at him as the leader. If the leader is all shook up what the hell are the other players supposed to do? Follow the "leader", what a wierd concept. So dont wonder why we always find ways to choke/lose games. Its because of that fraud behind center
Idgit;2793318 said:This thread is like watching bullies gang up on a ******** kid on the playground, and you feel guilty because you secretly think the ******** kid deserves it.
Hit him again.
PullMyFinger;2793881 said:I couldnt follow someone that wears their hat backwards like a 5 year old.
PullMyFinger;2793887 said:ROTFLMAO.....
PullMyFinger;2793902 said:Just another hata.
Apollo Creed;2794047 said:
Bleu Star;2794008 said:Instigator.
PullMyFinger;2794191 said:LOL...sometimes I agree with you, on the Tonya Romo subject. But not on the TO subject.
Nice post.gbrittain;2791840 said:Romo did not play great in the Baltimore more game, but when it mattered most he stepped up and did enough to win only to be let down by two ridiculous unforgiveable runs by the defense. Yet Romo is to blame because had he played well enough the first 3 quarters the defense would have never been in that position or so the theory goes.
I wonder if that same theory would apply in this scenario: Romo is playing lights out but the defense is less than stellar. All of a sudden in the fourth quarter the defense tightens up and Romo puts up even more points and Dallas now has a 13 point lead. However, with say 8 minutes to go or less Romo throws back to back INTs for TDs and Dallas loses the game. I am assuming that loss will still be on the defense? Right?
So really the Romo hates comes down to three games. The Seattle playoff game, last seasons Pittsburgh game and last seasons Philly game.
If you want to blame Romo the holder then be my guest. He was fired from that job.
If you want to blame Romo for the Pittsburgh game you have a legitimate complaint. However, Romo will not be the last QB to go into the eventual Super Bowl champs back yard in terrible weather playing the #1 defense in the NFL and come out not looking so good. Not making an excuse just he is not the first and won't be the last. He should have played a better game. I have no issues with putting that game on Romo.
Ahh...the Philly game. I don't know what to say. I am not sure Rowdy even showed up for that game. I have no problem with someone calling out Romo for not showing up, but are we calling out the leadership of Demarcus Ware for that game? No, because it is does not fit into the December Blame Romo Game. Am I suggesting Ware should be called out no, like I said you get handed a 44-6 whipping, you will be hard pressed to single out a person or two for a game like that. That smacks of haterade and not looking at things objectively at all.