GloryDaysRBack;3918872 said:Let's assume these are the two players we are selecting from..let's leave out whether it's @ 9 or 15 or anywhere else...which player would you rather have? I fully believe these are our top 2 targets
I'd be a little upset if they took him at 9. Unless they have have him valued that high (which I doubt) I'd prefer to take Castanzo in a trade down (if at all) then use the extra pick(s) to trade up later if necessary to grab anther starter. That's IF we went for this guy.SDogo;3918870 said:I'm not going to jump on Brian's side just because he is saying something I agree with, I have been very critical of him in the past but this is jiving with everything I have been saying for 2 or 3 weeks now.
With that said, your not going to convince me that Dallas will take him at 9. I know they have Castanzo, Smith, Watt and Jordan are very closely graded and would be happy to walk away with any of them.
They know as well as we do that a trade down 5 or 6 slots is likely to land you one of those guys in addition to multiple picks.
Bowdown27;3918892 said:I think we all agree a trade down with picking castonzo or even a long shot in smith we would all be ecstatic. I still want to trade for pp but I'd be happy with one of these two ol
fishspill;3918897 said:If they're that high on him then I really hope I'm wrong on his level of ability. I love his IQ, I love how he doesn't waste energy and plays smart, I just don't know about his ability to stick to a guy.
I'm no scout. I've also seen him do really well. I'm concerned about consistency. Just one uneducated opinion.
burmafrd;3918889 said:IF the boys really do believe that Smith is going to be that much better down the road there is NO excuse for not taking him.
burmafrd;3918889 said:IF the boys really do believe that Smith is going to be that much better down the road there is NO excuse for not taking him.
fortdick;3918898 said:Of whom do you speak?
jobberone;3918901 said:As I've said before a lot depends on how much of last year was due to injury to Colombo and how much they think they can depend on him this year. Smith is not ready to play right away. Constonzo is.
SDogo;3918870 said:I'm not going to jump on Brian's side just because he is saying something I agree with, I have been very critical of him in the past but this is jiving with everything I have been saying for 2 or 3 weeks now.
With that said, your not going to convince me that Dallas will take him at 9. I know they have Castanzo, Smith, Watt and Jordan are very closely graded and would be happy to walk away with any of them.
They know as well as we do that a trade down 5 or 6 slots is likely to land you one of those guys in addition to multiple picks.
Chocolate Lab;3918904 said:Amen.
It seems to me that we're getting way too far into need and "ready to play now" this year. Whatever happened to taking the best player available? Does anyone really think Anthony Castonzo is truly the ninth (or better) best player in the entire country? Or better said, that in two to three years he'll be the ninth (or better) best NFL player from this draft class?
I don't. He seems very ordinary to me. What's so special about him?
realtick;3918912 said:I'm sure you've written on the topic before, but what's your take on Castanzo? What do you think about him?