- Messages
- 47,997
- Reaction score
- 27,917
You must have it set on "film negative" mode. It can be confusing sometimes
Well, I'm not that bright.
You must have it set on "film negative" mode. It can be confusing sometimes
Cowboys need a vet S with single high experience, someone like Pat Chung.
I wouldn't be upset at all if the team drafted Brooks in the third rd, but I'll be horribly disappointed if the team passes on Donald or a Barr to draft Calvin Pryor and I really like the player. .
I agree about Wilcox and Church. It is year three on the Matt Johnson experiment. I will go out on a limb just because I've heard whispers about MJ being a ballhawk, that he will make a mark this year.
Lol, no.
Jerry at the NFL combine:
"And frankly, we like where we are with our young guys; some of them don't have the time on them they need, but we like where we are at safety."
Yeah, there ya go.
I wouldn't be surprised if they don't draft a safety at all. Clinton-Dix and Pryor were never the 10 yr plan at safety imo, they aren't Eric Berry/Earl Thomas caliber prospects. They might make sense for a team that feels their defense is a safety away from greatness but not here. Also doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me to spend yet another 4th on a safety. I'm still high on Wilcox as a potential starter
Lol @ ppl taking broudus' word as if its the front office's.
I believe in the philosophy that if you feel as an organization you have a position of strength or stabilization, ADD to it and make it stronger. Garrett has paraphrased this line of thinking in the past, but then you have idiot Jerry Jones being interviewed in the media and essentially saying that they're okay at safety. It's a conflict of interest between owner and coach and that's why we've been consistently mediocre for a long time now.
You mean we can't expect a 3rd round rookie and a UDFA rookie to play perfect every snap? Balderdash!!
Cowboys need a vet S with single high experience, someone like Pat Chung.