CowboyStar88
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,166
- Reaction score
- 25,557
Pretty sure you meant 'mom,' and now you're just covering.
Yeah you caught me! Guilty as charges
Pretty sure you meant 'mom,' and now you're just covering.
The OLineman that I wanted them to draft late or sign as a UDFA was Alvin Bailey. I liked him better than Warford. I still can't figure out why he didn't get drafted. He has been the active backup Guard for the Seahawks. He was reported to play well in the preseason/training-camp. I had both Bailey and Warford in the top 5 Guards for power; however, Bailey was much quicker and more athletic than Warford.
wow floyd??? you have me confused with someone else. i've never brought him up once since the draft.
the board is their board, not mine nor yours. i have no allegiance to it so i see no harm in discussing the matter. plus if he wasn't even on their board then that opens another can of worms with the scouting dept.
The fact is that given the choice I'd go with a pro scouting departents board over mine or any other fan out theres board every single time. Theres a reason they get paid to do that job and you and I and everyone else on a fan board complaining.
I have a hunch it was something more than just not supposedly being a fit with our current scheme that had Warford off of our board.
Escobar showed me enough in that Rams game to know that he will be a good TE really soon.You are correct that I did not back up my opinion re: the likely future performance of Gavin Escobar. It's kind of the point of my statement that we're going to have to wait and see. The reason being, as I explicitly said, TEs typically need a season or two to develop, and it was stated on draft day that this was a player who was going to have to develop both strength and blocking to play well in this league.
As for Warford, complaining about passing on him in the second when we'd taken and interior OL in the first, had a player we liked on board already, and later added a veteran off the street who turned out to be a nice addition is, I'm sorry, fretting over nothing. We obviously prioritized fixing the red zone offensive problems over stock piling an additional OG using a premium pick at a position that it has been repeatedly demonstrated can be filled from the middle rounds or lower. It would have been dumb to spend premium resources at an OG there, and complaining about not doing it is pointless.
We had a good draft. We've got good OG play right now. We've got a swing backup who can also play C for us on game day. We can develop another quality OG at marginal cost starting this offseason and not set ourselves back. It doesn't matter how much you may have wanted Warford to begin with, or how many mock drafts you put him in. It doesn't matter all that much how well he's playing. Other teams are going to draft players who play well in their systems, too. It's spontaneous fretting because there's no reason for it, and it only cropped up because of a random tweet that's just brought about by all this Guard-fretting that's gone on this entire last season when the problem with the team was never really with the OG play to begin with.
I have a hunch it was something more than just not supposedly being a fit with our current scheme that had Warford off of our board.
Honestly, can we have ONE thread about our oline that isn't derailed by Zordon and jnday? It's really getting annoying.
Escobar showed me enough in that Rams game to know that he will be a good TE really soon.
I think so. He's big and lumbering, with hands like catchers' mitts. He's just not getting a lot of opportunities yet. We'll see, but I think he's a guy who's going to develop into a pretty good player.
I just read through 7 pages of Escobar rueing, looking for an update on Leary , LOL
I'm curious on this last part. Why does it open a can of worms if they didn't have them on their board? Because you liked him? Because I liked him?
First off I liked Warford and would have been pleased with him. However, that said, I wouldn't try and proclaim what I like being more informed or a reason to beat my chest when it is compared to a pro scouting departments board.
The fact is that given the choice I'd go with a pro scouting departents board over mine or any other fan out theres board every single time. Theres a reason they get paid to do that job and you and I and everyone else on a fan board complaining.
Quit with your common sense. You are supposed to be ruing.Fall in line.I have a hunch it was something more than just not supposedly being a fit with our current scheme that had Warford off of our board.
Absolutely he will be the eventual replacement once Witten calls it a career.I think so. He's big and lumbering, with hands like catchers' mitts. He's just not getting a lot of opportunities yet. We'll see, but I think he's a guy who's going to develop into a pretty good player.
i saw somewhere that Leary practiced today - i think it was NFL nation on ESPN website
This is the news that this longgggg thread needed to hear.
All this for nothing, we are without the greatest pass rusher in Cowboys history, and we are sitting here talking about a guard who wasn't even hurt.......really?!?!?
Sometimes this place will drive you nuts.
Broaddus has proven he knows nothing more than the common fan.....