Except of course predicting Hunt was going to destroy Lesnar.
You forgot that point.
I also see you vacated the thread where you were claiming Steph Curry was "ball-dominant." Turns out you twisted/misused the "facts," or in this case the stats, until they said "UNCLE!!!"
Lesnar won the fight.. ok well temporarily.
Yes, I said Hunt would knock him out.
He didn't. Big whoop. Hunt hit Lesnar with one hard punch all fight.
That one punched rocked him.
Who exactly hasn't been wrong in a fight prediction?
You think you scored some major victory there? LOL.
You weren't even an account when I made those statements.
So you are gloating over a prediction you made what, in your head?
But exactly one person pointed to it being a joke. ME. It has proven to be very much a joke.
Lesnar made 2,5M tested dirty the day of the fight and is likely done for his career with MMA.
His final MMA victory looks like it will be from 2010 when he nearly was murdered by Carwin but the refs let him eat 100 shots that probably caused the serious damage he couldn't overcome for years.
Bottom line is the UFC never should have had Lesnar in this fight as it is a boxing like stunt.
As to the Curry thread I was talking to a petulant child and it got boring.
Curry is a ball dominant player. The stats I gave you were from this year's playoffs.
Curry handles the ball more than any GSW player and dribbles more than any GSW on average when he does handle it.
That is the very definition of ball dominant since it relates to per team.
Is he in a dribble drive system where he holds the ball to create offense? No.
Is he ball dominant within that offense as compared to his team mates? Very much so.
If you are still confused I can't help you any more.
You are going on ignore as too dense to deal with.