Browns may go QB at 1?

[Risen Star]

 

[Risen Star]

 

[Gaede]

Only the Browns...

 

[Vinnie2u]

Sounds like a smokescreen. Hoping somebody takes the bait and trades up to #1..

 

[fishspill]

Pre-draft noise. Draft timing with the Masters, NBA/NHL playoffs, and Easter means we suffer this nonsense.

 

[Risen Star]

Seems like it would be an exec from another team. Why would they blow smoke for Cleveland?

Listen, when you're gifted Carsus of Bismarck and shun him, you are eternally condemned. There's no hope. You are in football purgatory.

 

[Tristan]

I called bs on these qbs dropping, half the top ten really need a new or legit qb! Watson is amazing and the only negatives they come up with for trubisky are the same things they said about Wentz whom proved to be a legit franchise
QB to build around despite not starting until his final and only year and coming from a school which "doesnt traditionally produce franchise qb's" lol!

Which school produces a bunch of franchise qb's? Tenessee? Michigan? Stanford? Cal? Purdue? Oregon? Fl State? .......
None! If those schools and others didnt have that one guy then theyd have 0.

Anyways

I call 2 qb's top ten and most likely skyrocket to top 5 like last year
I call 2 more in first (Kizer & Mahomes)

Also everybodys talking about next years guys and how they would be picked ahead of this years guys. I remember when they said the same thing about Matt Leinart during the draft that Aaron Rodgers and Alex Smith came out so.....

 

[MonsterD]

I'm seeing stupid things right now like Mahomes will be a top 15 pick. That time again right before the draft.

 

[chicago JK]

Who knows. While everyone is saying Garrett is the clear number one, long term it doesn't always play out that way.

The smart move for the Browns would be to leak they are considering taking Mitchell at 1, while really liking Watson and hoping he falls to 12. Or maybe they just try to draft a QB in the second and tread water until next draft.

 

[StarBoyz83]

I can see it. What's the point in getting a DE when you have no qb?

 

[DFWJC]

Only the Browns...

So true!

 

[Risen Star]

I can see it. What's the point in getting a DE when you have no qb?

What's the point of not taking Wentz and then go QB at 1 the following year with an infinitely lesser prospect?

 

[RJ_MacReady]

They wouldn't be the Browns we all love if they didn't continue making bad decisions. Bless their little, stupid hearts. #BrownsgonnaBrowns

 

[StarBoyz83]

What's the point of not taking Wentz and then go QB at 1 the following year with an infinitely lesser prospect?

I don't know. I think they thought rg3 was good.

 

[DFWJC]

The one year where it is so cut and dry who to take....just....wow.

I guess if they make yet another massive haul of picks, trade down some, and get a QB plus a couple of extra 1sts.
Nahh, they already have two 1sts and 2nds this year and next.
Jeez, just Garrett

 

[Denim Chicken]

 

[Angus12]

I called bs on these qbs dropping, half the top ten really need a new or legit qb! Watson is amazing and the only negatives they come up with for trubisky are the same things they said about Wentz whom proved to be a legit franchise
QB to build around despite not starting until his final and only year and coming from a school which "doesnt traditionally produce franchise qb's" lol!

Not true. I'm an NDSU Bison fan from North Dakota. Wentz redshirted his freshman year, when they won their first of 5 National Championships in a row. The next two, he backed up Brock Jensen while the Bison won two more championships. He then started the next two years, and the Bison won two more Championships.

 

[Bigdog]

What's the point of not taking Wentz and then go QB at 1 the following year with an infinitely lesser prospect?

Or maybe they think the qbs this year are better than Wentz. I mean it is the Browns.

 

[Hailmary]

Who knows. While everyone is saying Garrett is the clear number one, long term it doesn't always play out that way.

The smart move for the Browns would be to leak they are considering taking Mitchell at 1, while really liking Watson and hoping he falls to 12. Or maybe they just try to draft a QB in the second and tread water until next draft.

Good points. If I were Cleveland, I may even be inclined to trade the 12th pick that includes some team's first rounder next year. This way they'll have two first rounders next year and ammo to move up to pick from a much better crop of QBs next year.

 

[Idgit]

Silliness. They're taking Garrett.