Such a tired argument. The biggest compliments for Romo is woudve couldve shouldve. Not what he actually accomplished, which is the same exact thing as that QB you mentioned. Yet he is heralded as some great. Very poor man's Favre who choked when it mattered most. Romo had the benefit coming in after some horrendous QB play after Aikman retired. So the bar was set extremely low. So fans gravitated to him. And prop him up and say 'what if this and what if that' which can't ever be proved or discredited. Instead of just judging him for what he was. A guy who could escape pressure and make plays out of nothing but overall, wasn't good enough to elevate a team in the playoffs. But he gets excuses made for him.
I like how one set of narrative is given to one QB vs another with these fans. Romo is some sort of mythical figure if you let Dallas fans describe him. Described as way better than he actually was.
I remember a QB who let his team play their worst ball down the stretch more times than not. The collapse at the end of 2008, 2011 and 2012. His performance in the win or go home end of year games vs the NFC East was very bad.
If you honestly think Romo was the reason we failed to reach the playoffs in 08, 11, 12 is beyond ridiculous its not even worth having a debate. We got lucky he dragged those teams to .500
And the playoff "defeats" have already been covered in this thread. No need to repeat.
Yes most people are going to hold Prescott to a hire standard. He walked into one of the greatest situations a quarteback can dream of. Has had superior teams then Romo has ever had bar a year, top 10 talent on both sides of the ball the last few years and better coaching.
Dak doesn't hold a candle to Romo skill wise. If you had to pick one to build a team around no one with two functioning brain cells would go with Dak. One was carrying teams until his body broke and one gets carried