News: BTB: Will McClay: Cowboys Wanted To Add Quality Depth, Increase Competition...vid added Post #5

NewsBot

New Member
Messages
111,281
Reaction score
2,947
usa-today-8635968.0.jpg

The Cowboys understand that teams that succeed have depth, and that's what they set out to get this offseason.

Over the past few days and weeks here at Blogging The Boys, we’ve been focusing a lot on depth and the quality of depth the Cowboys appear to have heading into 2015. Here are some of the articles we’ve published on the topic this month:


And given the strong focus on depth this month, it was a pleasant surprise to see a video on the mothership of Bryan Broaddus going 1-on-1 with Senior Director of Player Personnel Will McClay to talk, among other things, about depth. Here’s a transcript of the short interview. As usual, all transcription errors are mine.

star_medium.gif

Broaddus: Joined here by Senior Director of Player Personnel for the Cowboys Will McClay. Will, [you] finished up all the minicamps, all the OTAs, [is the] team looking like you envisioned going into training camp?

McClay: Looking good in t-shirts and shorts. That’s why it’s called the underwear Olympics. Getting the mechanics and basics down so that we can go in and see the physical ability, I think that’s the key.

Broaddus: In scouting, we always talk about protecting yourself. The roster, the depth of the roster and all that. In looking at the moves and stuff you made, it seems like you did a nice job of protecting yourself at a lot of different positions. Especially like at running back as well.

McClay: I think that’s the key. The teams that succeed down the long road that Jerry and Steven talk about all the time, they have depth. So we wanted to try and find quality depth, and build that while increasing the competition.

Broaddus: Are there certain positions you’re looking at right now? Even though we have the next four or five weeks to sit back and evaluate our team a little more, that you might make a move or two before training camp?

McClay: We’re always looking to improve and if that opportunity comes and it makes sense, we’ve got to improve. And that what we do, look at the roster, look at waivers, what’s going on, what’s out there and try to improve.

Broaddus: This is one of the first camps in the last couple of years where Tony Romo has actually been able to participate in all the workouts. Talk about what that means to you as a personnel and front office guy going into camp.

McClay: It’s a quarterback league. And when you have one of the best quarterbacks in the league and he’s healthy, you feel good about that. And then with Brandon Weeden having another year in the same system, the development of the young guys, you feel good about that position. We’re always going to try to look at that position as well, but we’re glad we got Tony.

Broaddus: You added an elite pass rusher in Greg Hardy. We don’t know what the suspension is going to entail, might be ten, might be two, we don’t know that. But talk about how rare it is to get a talent like that.

McClay: Again, we’re always trying to improve the team so when that opportunity comes about, we want to do that. And then you add Randy Gregory. We increased the speed of our team in the pass rush ability.

Continue reading...
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,710
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Marinelli was a great hire.Lindman was a great hire.
In my opinion, Willie McClay is just as big.

Keeping McClay on the staff will make us a perennial contender

I would call the Cowboys current roster policy as "Overload"; whereas, I would call their old policy as "Just Enough".

In the old days, if they had Lee, McClain and Hitchens at LB, they would have been content with a bunch of Cam Lawrence types as the backups. Instead, they spent some money to get legit backups like Brinkley and Gachkar and still drafted 2 LBs and signed another veteran with talent (Rivers).
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,919
Reaction score
112,953
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
News: BTB: Will McClay: Cowboys Wanted To Add Quality Depth, Increase Competition
I'd say they accomplished that. The off season haul of new players is really pretty amazing. I love the aggressive approach the Cowboys are taking these last few years.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,684
Reaction score
12,394
Marinelli was a great hire.Lindman was a great hire.
In my opinion, Willie McClay is just as big.

Keeping McClay on the staff will make us a perennial contender

I don't think it is so much McClay but having a personnel guy who is on the same page with the coaching staff. That understanding of how guys could fit is what we'd missed for a while.
 

waving monkey

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,540
Reaction score
14,930
I don't think it is so much McClay but having a personnel guy who is on the same page with the coaching staff. That understanding of how guys could fit is what we'd missed for a while.

My thoughts are there seems to be more emphases on high effort ,character guys since McClay has been heading the draft section. What ever it is just keep that pattern and we're good shape
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,312
Reaction score
32,716
In looking at the moves and stuff you made, it seems like you did a nice job of protecting yourself at a lot of different positions. Especially like at running back as well.

What?!?!?!? :eek::huh::eek::huh:
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,030
Reaction score
22,617
No matter how well prepared, there will always be 'brain farts.' But the talent and hustle of this group of players will overcome most all mistakes.
 

PhillyCowboysFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,062
Reaction score
4,968
I don't think it is so much McClay but having a personnel guy who is on the same page with the coaching staff. That understanding of how guys could fit is what we'd missed for a while.

I disagree and this is why. First I am biased towards McClay. I have followed him since Mikey mentioned to watch out for him several years ago. He just has an eye for talent and I will bet that he soon will be mentioned as one of the best when it comes to that.

But the real reason I say that I disagree is that Bill Parcels was buying most of his groceries here. Can't be on any better page then with yourself. We see where that got our starting roster let alone roster depth.

But I do understand the importance of the GM or in this case, head talent evaluator being on the same page as the coaches philosophy
 

CyberB0b

Village Idiot
Messages
12,639
Reaction score
14,106
I would call the Cowboys current roster policy as "Overload"; whereas, I would call their old policy as "Just Enough".

In the old days, if they had Lee, McClain and Hitchens at LB, they would have been content with a bunch of Cam Lawrence types as the backups. Instead, they spent some money to get legit backups like Brinkley and Gachkar and still drafted 2 LBs and signed another veteran with talent (Rivers).

To be fair, they signed those guys long before they had worked out a deal with McClain. They were preparing for the worst case scenario. We had depth in the past, but we had some comical injury streaks, which lead to guys like Brady Poppinga putting in way more time than he should have.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,684
Reaction score
12,394
I disagree and this is why. First I am biased towards McClay. I have followed him since Mikey mentioned to watch out for him several years ago. He just has an eye for talent and I will bet that he soon will be mentioned as one of the best when it comes to that.

But the real reason I say that I disagree is that Bill Parcels was buying most of his groceries here. Can't be on any better page then with yourself. We see where that got our starting roster let alone roster depth.

But I do understand the importance of the GM or in this case, head talent evaluator being on the same page as the coaches philosophy

Are you actually saying Parcells didn't do well in talent acquisition? He did a very good job in both acquiring talent and developing the talent we had on our roster. When Bill left we started having some awful drafts. Of course, folks are going to chime in with "but he wanted to do x instead of y" or "but he didn't want to start Romo" junk but it is just plain ignorant to say he did not improve our roster considerably.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,684
Reaction score
12,394
My thoughts are there seems to be more emphases on high effort ,character guys since McClay has been heading the draft section. What ever it is just keep that pattern and we're good shape

Parcells was all about character - team captain, high effort types. The drafts under Phillips trended more toward superior athletes as the prime focus.

Garrett is very similar to BP in several manners (which is why Jerry had hoped to bring Jason in under Parcells for at least a year). His influence on this roster is clear as is Marinelli's. McClay understands what they are looking for.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,710
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
To be fair, they signed those guys long before they had worked out a deal with McClain. They were preparing for the worst case scenario. We had depth in the past, but we had some comical injury streaks, which lead to guys like Brady Poppinga putting in way more time than he should have.

Their ILBs for week 1 that year were Lee, Carter and Connor. Not really any depth. Poppinga was signed during the season.
 

waving monkey

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,540
Reaction score
14,930
Parcells was all about character - team captain, high effort types. The drafts under Phillips trended more toward superior athletes as the prime focus.

Garrett is very similar to BP in several manners (which is why Jerry had hoped to bring Jason in under Parcells for at least a year). His influence on this roster is clear as is Marinelli's. McClay understands what they are looking for.

I'm parsing words some but the quality of draft under McClay far exceeds BP's through the entire
length of rounds. Parcells jsut didn't have a talent evaluator on staff like McClay
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,684
Reaction score
12,394
I'm parsing words some but the quality of draft under McClay far exceeds BP's through the entire
length of rounds. Parcells jsut didn't have a talent evaluator on staff like McClay

How can you possibly make that claim without actually seeing if players develop? McClay has really only been THE guy since last year's draft.

Just looking at last year's haul of 7th rounders doesn't really suggest being better through the length of rounds. I certainly hope some of those guys pan but it is hard to point to what McClay has done since taking over as producing better drafts than Parcells. Similarly in Round 5 we've got an unknown value in Street. Hitchens is a nice pick up in Round 4 but the jury is still out on the swap for Lawrence. Obviously Martin is a stud but it doesn't take a great evaluator to know that - everyone in the league knew that, it was just a matter of whether we were going to take him (and that's not McClay's call).

You just don't have enough time to see the guys on the field being evaluated after a single draft.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,710
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I disagree and this is why. First I am biased towards McClay. I have followed him since Mikey mentioned to watch out for him several years ago. He just has an eye for talent and I will bet that he soon will be mentioned as one of the best when it comes to that.

But the real reason I say that I disagree is that Bill Parcels was buying most of his groceries here. Can't be on any better page then with yourself. We see where that got our starting roster let alone roster depth.

But I do understand the importance of the GM or in this case, head talent evaluator being on the same page as the coaches philosophy

Being on same page as the coaches is a big upgrade from when Ciscowski was running the draft during the Wade Phillips years and early in the Garrett years.

Parcells ran the draft from the seat of his pants without a structured approach. He drafted Carpenter and Jacob Rogers because their Dad's were players or coaches. He wanted Merriman over Ware and wanted to draft Spear before Ware when they had the two 1st round picks. He thought Julius Jones was about as good as Steven Jackson.

McClay seems to have a very business like, methodical approach.
 

waving monkey

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,540
Reaction score
14,930
How can you possibly make that claim without actually seeing if players develop? McClay has really only been THE guy since last year's draft.

Just looking at last year's haul of 7th rounders doesn't really suggest being better through the length of rounds. I certainly hope some of those guys pan but it is hard to point to what McClay has done since taking over as producing better drafts than Parcells. Similarly in Round 5 we've got an unknown value in Street. Hitchens is a nice pick up in Round 4 but the jury is still out on the swap for Lawrence. Obviously Martin is a stud but it doesn't take a great evaluator to know that - everyone in the league knew that, it was just a matter of whether we were going to take him (and that's not McClay's call).

You just don't have enough time to see the guys on the field being evaluated after a single draft.

Its kinda like when Red was named head coach some of us just knew he'd be a good or better coach
sometimes you don't need to see three years down the road .You have evaluated,investigated.
You know some have to read the numbers and measure ther results.

Last year: Martin? did you need to measure and see him produce?
TLawrence do you?
Hitchens 4th round pick might start this year but after last year you need more?

This year BJones is already showing up
Randy G ?
3rd round has big question mark
4th round
5th
I'll stand by what I said.I've seen McClay production his better then what ever BP had
available by a long shot.
 
Top