Burger King- Thinks Cowboys will cut TO

I don't see TO getting any different treatment. Crayton and Carp run their mouths. Now Garrett. Romo did some.

They emulate the owner and GM. Until they shut everyone up then it will remain a circus. It only takes a little for the media to blow it up or have private conversations become public then damage relationships. Parcells is laughing his *** off.
 
Bleu Star;2590556 said:
Well it's faulty majik. ;) I'm actually happily married and approaching 17 years of marital bliss. :D


Sweet?


:star:
 
Bleu Star;2589559 said:
Starting yet another TO thread = best postcount padding technique ever


Hey I didn't know you were a chick, bleu star or are you a cross dresser?
 
dbair1967;2589125 said:
So he says in latest MMQB.

I believe it to. I think TO has played his last game here.

Excellent player most of the time, has given us some big production. But we will win more without him.

Oh yea? Name the last 3 year stretch when we've won as many games?

I bet you'll find another similar, prima-donna wide receiver on that team. ;) Though he was more like Pac-Man with as many court appearances, hookers and fur coats as he had back in the day.

Now, tell me about the record the 3 years prior to TO being here?

Back then, even with a Troy Aikman as QB and an Emmitt Smith as RB, we did little to nothing without our over self-glorified, total-distraction WR once he retired. And I'm sure many said the same, get rid of that distraction and we'll win just as many games. And if they didn't, I wonder where half of you people were to not be saying it. Prison? And actually that is a rhetorical question, because I remember factually that many people had a lot of opinions on Irvin and what he was quickly becoming to this team from a distraction standpoint. Something TO has never become as a Cowboy yet, and doubt he ever will. That would take some work. His career doesn't have long enough left in it.
 
I think it would be funny after his "I'm gonna retire a Cowboy" comment.
 
cowboyed;2597304 said:
Hey I didn't know you were a chick, bleu star or are you a cross dresser?

I've never seen a man more obsessed with another man in my life. And I have my doubts about TO's "lifestyle."
 
McCordsville Cowboy;2589137 said:
Yeah right.....

Dumbest thing said on this forum since conception.

TO isn't the problem. Its the playcalling , overrated O-Line, no coverage saftey's But releasing TO is going to solve all of that right?
:banghead: I agree Owens isn't the issue Garret got figured out and just didn't adjust!:bang2: The secondary well let just say if I could I would line them up and :shoot2: !
 
dbair1967;2589125 said:
So he says in latest MMQB.

I believe it to. I think TO has played his last game here.

Excellent player most of the time, has given us some big production. But we will win more without him.

King is CLEARLY trying to keep HIS NAME in the spotlight.

Lets see.... um.... today I will just say that I think the Cowboys will cut TO.


I am suprised you fell for that.
 
Lets just put it this way: Jerry has stated he will stand pat with the coaching staff (minus Read and Stewart) as well as with the roster. So far he hasn't changed that stance.

Add in the fact that Jerry would have to pay 9 million + 600 grand to an empty roster spot in tough economic times, and yeah. He ain't going anywhere folks.

Jerry would fire Wade before he cut TO, and neither have happened yet, or are likely to at this point in time.
 
RoadRunner;2597967 said:
Lets just put it this way: Jerry has stated he will stand pat with the coaching staff (minus Read and Stewart) as well as with the roster. So far he hasn't changed that stance.

Add in the fact that Jerry would have to pay 9 million + 600 grand to an empty roster spot in tough economic times, and yeah. He ain't going anywhere folks.

Jerry would fire Wade before he cut TO, and neither have happened yet, or are likely to at this point in time.

The whole minus Read and Stewart thing means he DID NOT stand pat.
 
DallasEast;2598093 said:
umm...

That's like... THREE days ago. :rolleyes: ;) :)

How does that show that TO is a cancer? Because he pointed out something on film?

You guys try really really hard. I will give you that.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,666
Messages
13,825,192
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top