phildadon86
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,890
- Reaction score
- 32,817
Maybe in a small trade down. Grab a 4th then use that 4th on the kid I mentioned earlier.A guard at #12??
Maybe in a small trade down. Grab a 4th then use that 4th on the kid I mentioned earlier.A guard at #12??
Campbell likely wont even be there at 12Maybe in a small trade down. Grab a 4th then use that 4th on the kid I mentioned earlier.
They can have him.......kids got Luke Joeckel bust written all over him.I guess the Cheatriots dont subscribe to Steve's channel. Supposedly they like him a lot.
Exactlyits the same as thinking a tenth of a second on the 40 means you cannot play
Most of the time I agree with this guys takes he and Mcshay. But this time I'm not seeing it.He said he had really good tape but not great tape in his opinion.
Even at guard he'd be elite, and worthy of being taken top 15. Not concerned.It's not so much Campbell's arm length that concerns me, or should I say that it's not the only concern. The part that gets less attention is that he's an average mover. He could overcome short arms if he was a Rashawn Slater type athlete, but he's just not there. And the combo of the two becomes a real problem when DEs take him out to "deep water" on the edge, especially when they get him wide and hit him with a bull rush.
Campbell's an excellent guard prospect IMO. He's strong, has great technique, and looks pretty good at climbing up to hit LBs on run plays. I think he's a 10-year starter inside. But the deeper into space he goes, the worse he gets.
I'd happily draft him in the teens as a guard. But if he gets drafted in the 5-10 range and asked to start at LT, some team's not going to end up very happy with their pick.