Can 9 year veteran Dak Prescott lead today's Dallas Cowboys to a Super Bowl?

Why is that?

Why is that?
Part of it is the star, the other is Dak not playing top notch in the playoffs, although he's had his moments.

It's a moot point because nobody is going to get rid of a phil Simms, Jared Goff, brad Johnson, Kirk cousins in his prime level QB.

He's good enough to win a super bowl with a great line and defense.

We just saw hurts win a Superbowl lol
 
Why is that?
We all remember aikman and Bernie winning the Superbowl in 93.

I also remember emmitt getting the rock 8 straight times and the cowboys oline imposing it's will on buffalo.

I always say that the 14 and 16 cowboys had the best chance because of the oline. We'll see what happens. I loved the pick of booker and guyton last year.
 
KC lost in the superbowl. it was 100% Mahomes fault!?

and as I said, he needs to be better. but nothing ever, never is 100% one players fault. never. does he bear more responsibility? yes. but 100%. that's utter stupidity. pure stupidity. nothing but stupidity. there is no denying that if anyone thinks its 100% one player. they are stupid.
That's why YOU get so much comeback......... you've tried to equate one game where Mahomes couldnt produce inhuman magic with three instances of Dak Play-off inability to perform at the clutch moment.

Its NOTHING to do with BLAME, its all to do with whether, moving forward, Dak with:
- 20% of the CAP
- his universally accepted need of FULL weapons/protection
- Jerry's inability to take the ultimate risk
- Dak's persistent ability to implode when taken out of his comfort zone: trailing by more than 3pts vrs a Play-off team, ESPECIALLY in 4thQ and where the clock or scoreboard id ticking.

Dak, whilst a good QB, has such holes in his game (and/or psyche) that means is HARD/DIFFICULT/IMPOSSIBLE to build a SB team around him.

2025 is his chance (forget the score and team record), just show us that he can LEAD and direct this YOUNG/pretty inexperienced Offense.
 
We all remember aikman and Bernie winning the Superbowl in 93.

I also remember emmitt getting the rock 8 straight times and the cowboys oline imposing it's will on buffalo.

I always say that the 14 and 16 cowboys had the best chance because of the oline. We'll see what happens. I loved the pick of booker and guyton last year.
Yep, the O-line, the gift that gives twice (protection and running game). Add in Pickens, speed in Blue and the varied talents of J Williams, this SHOULD be the springboard for 2026.
If a running game emerges and the Dallas d can stop the run.
2025, is the time for the run game and Offense to produce, if, as expected/hoped it produces, there's no excuse why Jerry cant go ALL-IN and fix the remaining issues (probably run D).

Run Defense is a major concern, as it feeds into Dak's 'struggles' when the clock is ticking down. Run Defense isnt that much of a concern to other teams (or QB's)
 
I do whatever I want. What are you going to do about it? Nothing but complain as usual.
I'd say you do FAR more complaining than me.

But of course you do you. But you should know you can't change anyone any more than they can change you so why bother?

Telling other people how they should fan. Then lecture me about telling you what to do. Classic.
 
That's why YOU get so much comeback......... you've tried to equate one game where Mahomes couldnt produce inhuman magic with three instances of Dak Play-off inability to perform at the clutch moment.

Its NOTHING to do with BLAME, its all to do with whether, moving forward, Dak with:
- 20% of the CAP
- his universally accepted need of FULL weapons/protection
- Jerry's inability to take the ultimate risk
- Dak's persistent ability to implode when taken out of his comfort zone: trailing by more than 3pts vrs a Play-off team, ESPECIALLY in 4thQ and where the clock or scoreboard id ticking.

Dak, whilst a good QB, has such holes in his game (and/or psyche) that means is HARD/DIFFICULT/IMPOSSIBLE to build a SB team around him.

2025 is his chance (forget the score and team record), just show us that he can LEAD and direct this YOUNG/pretty inexperienced Offense.
I didn't try to equate anything. all I said was nothing is ever 100% on a single player. end of story. yet you trying to spin it into, yes it is. its 100%. I used one example. so in that case, you look at it one game at a time. like I did. you try to look at the summation and over all performance over several games and several year.

and why is it when Dak haters want to make a point about the salary, its all about averages. you know year to year the salary cap is managed and the cap hit isn't based on averages. in the first contract his cap hit was 17,19, 25M the first three years, although the average said its much higher than that. keep in mind, the cap goes up every year too, so those averages you use tend to drop.

the whole point I made and it was clear. Dak carries more of the fault burden than others, but not 100%. end of story. that is a fact that is undisputable.
now go play with the percentages as much as you like and have fun.

and Dak is not going to lead into anything. this franchise hasn't led into anything for 30 years. latest is Dak era. after Dak there will be another and before Dak there were others. people just choose a side and go at it. before Dak, there was Romo and people had chosen sides. some switched, some didn't after Dak became QB.

and this offense is young on the OL. pretty experienced everywhere else.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,633
Messages
13,888,137
Members
23,792
Latest member
Irvin_truther
Back
Top