Rack;1930457 said:
Well technically Roy's best year ever was when Dave Campo was the head coach.
Dang it hurt to type that.
..it was a completely different defense then, we played a 4-3 and I don't care how people want to sugar coat it..
...there is a difference in the secondary in the 4-3 and the 3-4.
The nature of the pass rush and run defense is very different, the combination coverages involved with the LBers in that scheme is different from the 3-4 and that effects the safties as well.
Roy Williams was drafted to help a 4-3 defense.
His style of play was to help at the strong safety position to put pressure on the QB and to punish runners within 10 yards of the LOS.
His pass coverage skills downfield where NOT why he was drafted. If you read the above, his skills were a description of a LBer posing as a safety right from the start.
Campo and Zimmer used him like that as well. He isn't supposed to intercept or breakup passes. He was supposed to make Qb's throw quicker on blitzes and to separate the ballcarrier from the ball with in 5-10 yards from the line of scrimmage where he has his power to accelerate and deliver a blow.
Even the 'horsecollar' tackle that Williams has now made famous, to me is because too often, in the role he plays, he has responsibilities downfield in the secondary he just isn't fast enough or quick enough to do.
So he often isn't in front of the the ball carrier or parallel to him because it's usually a WR free downfield or a TE that is floating free because RW is being played out of position and the defensive coverage is flawed using him like it does..
Therefore, he has to reach out and drag the player down from behind...because he is behind the play.
And he developed a bad habit to coop with it..the 'horsecollar'.
Williams is best coming up to meet the ball or from the side once some contact has been made.
As we all can see, he's not a sure tackling safety.
He want to lay a hit on the player and often doesn't wrap up and just make the tackle. His instincts and the whole reason we drafted him was to be a physical presence on the defense.
The way we play it in the 3-4, he's not fit for the scheme and he needs more beef in front of him to allow him to flow to the ballcarrier and make his play in tight spaces where he can step up and make a hit.
Playing him in any open space is inviting trouble.
So until there is a change in the defense to a 4-3 and his role is changed back to how they started out using him and drafted him for, Campo or not Campo are we going to use Williams as best uses his skill set.
Can it be done..? I'm not sure in the Phillips 3-4. Maybe.
Year Two will tell us all we need to know about Roy Williams and what we have in him since we all have too much film to review about what
NOT TO DO with Roy.
:starspin
ReDBaLL ExPreSS