jobberone;3843477 said:Newman is pretty physical. He can play safety. The problem I see is his staying healthy enough to play well and stay on the field. I'm not saying he will get hurt but it is an issue of concern.
Stautner;3843338 said:Well, he could last longer if he played like Ball and just stayed away from the middle of the field and as far from the line of scrimmage as possible.
TwoDeep3;3843456 said:Jerry Jones plays closer to the line of scrimmage than Ball.
Sarge;3843500 said:All this is great and everything but....he's not going to be moved to FS. Period.
Chocolate Lab;3842747 said:Is there anyone on this board more arrogant than you, Fuzzy? Anytime anyone disagrees with you, they are ignorant, uneducated, or not worldly enough.
Why would you posit that I know little about how weight is gained and lost?
Thanks for letting me know that you need protein and a calorie surplus to gain weight, though. I had no idea! :laugh2:
Chocolate Lab;3844363 said:I'm only answering this because you're being so melodramatic in saying that I'm pimping anything or that I have some "nonsense train of thought". This isn't that complicated.
My contention is that Newman is a naturally skinny guy (he weighed 150 in high school and only 170 as an overaged sophomore at K-State, google it) and that he can't hold much more muscle on his frame. Grown, drug-free adults who work diligently for literally years to gain muscle can only functionally hold so much lean weight, and eventually hit a wall. IMO the 33 year old Newman is maxed out, and has been for a while.
This is hardly some outrageous opinion, regardless of what you may say.
It's nothing against the guy at all. He's been my favorite player on the team for a long time now. It's just physiology.
BTW, those google links mentioning college are obviously picking up his current weight.
Now go ahead. I'm not into endless bickering back and forth so you can have the last word.
Chocolate Lab;3844363 said:I'm only answering this because you're being so melodramatic in saying that I'm pimping anything or that I have some "nonsense train of thought". This isn't that complicated.
My contention is that Newman is a naturally skinny guy (he weighed 150 in high school and only 170 as an overaged sophomore at K-State, google it) and that he can't hold much more muscle on his frame. Grown, drug-free adults who work diligently for literally years to gain muscle can only functionally hold so much lean weight, and eventually hit a wall. IMO the 33 year old Newman is maxed out, and has been for a while.
This is hardly some outrageous opinion, regardless of what you may say.
It's nothing against the guy at all. He's been my favorite player on the team for a long time now. It's just physiology.
BTW, those google links mentioning college are obviously picking up his current weight.
Now go ahead. I'm not into endless bickering back and forth so you can have the last word.
FuzzyLumpkins;3844698 said:For contrast (or lack thereof)Terence Newman now:
[youtube]feYtJzyoQ-w[/youtube]
Chocolate Lab;3844692 said:I said I was done, but when you put it like that:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/college/rosters/2000/kkb/
Stautner;3844711 said:So you are going onhow big he "looked" in video tape, and Lab is going by the actual size listed on the roster.
Hmmm - not sure i would go with they accuracy of an eyeball measurement of a guy in pads (perhaps even different sized pads) on video tap over the accuracy of an actual scale.
FuzzyLumpkins;3844719 said:He finally showed something.
I didn't believe he was right after his other claim of Newman putting on weight after he got here was wrong. One out of two is not bad I guess.
All this says is that at age 21, Newman put on weight. He has maintained that weight since and quite frankly many, many young men go through the process of filling out around that time.
its not like its some aberration.
Do you think that Newman can play at 200 or 205 and maintain his speed and quickness for the most part?
Stautner;3844725 said:I would guess - and that's all it is, that if he put on 5-6 punds it wouldna't affect his spedmuch, but if he put on 10-15 pounds it might. Considering speed is his one true asset, I dona't know how it owuld make sense to sacrifice speed to move him to FS. I don't imagine 5-10 pounds is really going to make him any more of a hitter or any more willing and able to take on 235 lb RB's and 265 lb TE's head on at full speed. He is a speed guy, not a physical player, and that is at least as much mentality is size. More size helps - it's easier to have that mentality when your body can take that kind of collision, but i don't see beefing up a guy whos career has been built on speed as a way to manufacture that kind of mentality.
FuzzyLumpkins;3844728 said:You do not just mindlessly put on weight. You add strength in the bubble and thighs so that when he engages blockers he has a stronger base to work with.
Also his physicality at corner is most definitely an asset of his. He is one of the more physical corners in the NFL.
Stautner;3844741 said:I understand you don't just mindlessly put on weight, but that doesn't mean that the added weight, wherever and however it is put on, wouldn't affect his speed - or his flexibility - or his quickness. If it were that easy the NFL would have everyone put on weight because they could make everyone stronger without sacrificing anything. Unfortunately, it isn't that simple.
Second, I'm not sure if he is one of THE MOST physical CB's, but I will concede he is a reasonably physical CB. The problem is, we aren't talking about him playing CB, and we aren't talking about him being physical on pass routes with WR's who are focusing on catching a pass. We are talking now about run support and taking on a 230 lb RB coming at you straight on with a full head of steam, or doing the same with a 265 lb TE. No benefit of coming from the side or going for an ankle tackle - you are the safety - last line of defense - you have to take them on.
FuzzyLumpkins;3844747 said:I have no doubt that weight in the legs and butt would effect his twitch athleticism. I guess its just to what degree.
With Ratliff undersized at the nose having a smaller -even 205 is on the low side- safety in the middle of the field seems like a bad idea.
As for physical play he attacks sweeps and smoke routes and most of the time (read: not last year) he can bring the carrier down. Most corners are not that physical.
Doomsday;3844762 said:You really want to play Newman $8.5 million next season to find out if he can play FS? That would be a mistake in my opinion.
TwoDeep3;3843579 said:Let's illuminate a distinction here.
Can he actually play the position?
For the most part probably.
But he also would get the snot beat out of him and get hurt. Which means ultimately he cannot play safety.