- Messages
- 101,909
- Reaction score
- 112,912
Traded for a RB, traded for a QB and traded for a WR. Check, check and check.They misjudged their run game, their backup quarterback, and what they had at wide receiver.
Traded for a RB, traded for a QB and traded for a WR. Check, check and check.They misjudged their run game, their backup quarterback, and what they had at wide receiver.
Marked you down for giving up. Will re-visit at end of year.
Marked you down for giving up. Will re-visit at end of year.
Can you deal only in absolutes? Do you have to be absolutely in and praise everything they do, or absolutely out and hate everything they do in your world?
Jerry and son Stephen would likely have much more seriously considered Chris Johnson if it weren't for the financial implications of that potential signing. Both were obviously in a cap cost-saving mode. Hence, DMC.
Isn't CJ making Vets minimum?
I have no idea -- you tell me. Maybe they only thought he would come expensively or perhaps they contacted him and he demanded more at that point in time. There are several possible scenarios.
I have no idea -- you tell me. Maybe they only thought he would come expensively or perhaps they contacted him and he demanded more at that point in time. There are several possible scenarios.
I guess my contention is hopefully they didn't just "think" he would come expensively thereby assuming without having the conversation. If they did contact him, it must have been via cup & string because I don't recall seeing any news of such contact.
Isn't CJ making Vets minimum?
So if you have "no idea", why are you attempting to make claims based on financial reasons?
It wasn't specifically intended as a claim but far more in the realm of conjecture. Does that bother you? If so, maybe you'd be willing to tolerate. There's not much doubt the FO was a cap-saving mode. I think some of us, at least myself, felt CJ might be a fairly costly acquisition, although I had 'no idea' exactly what it might be. If that's pure ignorance on my part, mea culpa. I think DMC was somewhat more in the area of coming cheaply.
It sure looked like it was making an excuse while not knowing the facts. A rush to defend the Cowboys while not knowing the truth.
Money, or any lack thereof, isn't a factor in the team not signing Chris Johnson, and any claims otherwise are inaccurate and off base.
Anybody searching for an excuse should look elsewhere.
You need to get the stick out. I don't make excuses for the Cowboys nor the FO -- never have, never will. If I can't state my ideas here without you coming to knee-jerk conclusions, too bad for both of us.
Jerry and son Stephen would have likely considered Chris Johnson much more seriously if it weren't for the financial implications of that potential signing. Both were deeply in a cap-saving mode. Hence, DMC's contract.
Ok... Instead of starting another thread, I figured I would just post it here since the themes are similar.
So are y'all just going to gloss completely over the fact that Jerry Jones announced that McFadden will start this week? Should we just start referring to him as Coach Jones? I believe we are probably the only team in the league where the owner announces lineup changes..lol Pls discuss.
.