Putting aside the validity of his beliefs, you misread his post. He said don't sign a QB that has a contract longer than a year past 34 years old. He didn't say don't sign a guy who is already a year past 34.
A little premature aren't you. Aikman took just as much punishment, his back also led to his retirement, and he has done fine booth work for
years. Romo could do coaching or booth work and I suspect he will do just fine.
Franchise QB's like Manning, Brady & Romo don't sign one year deals. Some team will give them a longer deal cause franchise
QB's don't grow on trees and are scarce as hen's teeth.
That was an awkward fall Romo had!
The guy doesn't miss many football games. That perception is false.
Now we're ready to retire him?!
I'm about to go full CCboys and kick every last one of you out of my fox hole and tell you to get on that burn barrel duty!
hate to break it to you Catch Romo will never get SB - he does not have it him - besides we need a D also so how many years will that take ?
But Aikman didn't retire because of his back. He retired because of concussions. It's true that Troy had back issues but I don't think the situations are exactly the same.
This is true, some team will. Denver would do that today if the opportunity were there to do so. This is why the Cowboys would have been smart, IMO, to trade him and plan for the future. Had we done that then, we would likely be in a position today to have a QB ready to go. It's hindsite but in retrospect, I can't help but feeling like the club just refuses to acknowledge certain fatal flaws. They just can't figure out when it's time to let go and plan for the next guy, in terms of QB. They drafted Dax this year and may actually luck out there because what we are seeing of him in pre-season is not what you saw in his college career but even still, it's two years too late. JMO
Not to argue but, Broaddus and Mickey from DC.com both said that Aikman's back issues led to him pretty much being a statue who
couldn't move and the hits he took due to lack of mobility led to the concussions. Just repeating their info...
Teams and coaching staffs just won't take that risk. They know their jobs are on the line and starting over with another unproven QB can
lead to quick firings. We don't have a GM scared to act because it's the owner though. Manning, Brady, Brees all stay for years cause teams
know they can't win without them.
So we wouldn't get any huge cap savings until 2018? Damn.
I guess in 3 years we can finally sign some real F.A.'s. It will be nice having a proven DE, a Pro level SS and a LB outside of LEE that actually belongs in the starting lineup. ONLY 3 years away.
Not to argue but, Broaddus and Mickey from DC.com both said that Aikman's back issues led to him pretty much being a statue who
couldn't move and the hits he took due to lack of mobility led to the concussions. Just repeating their info...
Once again, one of the worst contracts ever. People will call it team-friendly. But you never should sign a quarterback to more than one year past age 34, unless they're the elite of the elite and have already won a championship.
From my fuzzy memory I believe Aikman will tell you it was the back, not concussions.
Did those other teams have a QB that had multiple injuries?No worse than other teams have with their to flight QB's.