Carolina Panthers vs Denver Broncos Superbowl 50 Game Thread

Yes he was.. Otherwise Dan Reeves would have been here. And saying the players quit in him is just subjective nonsense. The offense turned the ball over 19 times in those 9 games and the defense still produced 10 TOs for them.

he should of demanded it... his DC objected to having the current DC for the Packers, (can't remember his name) so they didn't bring him in....
 
Well I know I don't understand it.

If the receiver has control of the ball as the ball contacts the ground which the Carolina receiver did it's a catch but if the ball appears to come loose or move when contacting the ground it's incomplete.
 
Turnovers, turnovers, turnovers.

Hopefully this returns for us next year. If not, get Marinelli out of here.
 
he should of demanded it... his DC objected to having the current DC for the Packers, (can't remember his name) so they didn't bring him in....

I agree, that's Wade's big weakness. But then if you look at how Garrert interfered with the Callahan promotion to play-caller and changing the offense, then you realize the organization is structured in such a way that they lean towards Garrerr no matter what. It doesn't help that Garrett's father is Jerry's right hand man.
 
If the receiver has control of the ball as the ball contacts the ground which the Carolina receiver did it's a catch but if the ball appears to come loose or move when contacting the ground it's incomplete.

Thanks.

The rule is a joke and needs to be rewritten.
 
Thanks.

The rule is a joke and needs to be rewritten.

It is a joke hopefully it will be simplified to remove some of the judgement to avoid controversial calls.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,268
Messages
13,801,788
Members
23,776
Latest member
saturdaysarebetter
Back
Top