Stash
Staff member
- Messages
- 78,855
- Reaction score
- 103,619
To respond to, expand on my own question, I find the lack of interest in Lynch to be interesting. The pros for Wentz is that he has the ideal "look" of an NFL QB. But Lynch has better physical attributes across the board. The cons against Wentz are that his team was better without him, he played against bad competition, and his game wasn't as sharp as other QBs. But Lynch's team was great with him, he played against better competition, and he had one of the most impressive years of any QB last year. The pros for Goff are that he was an excellent QB in college. But Lynch was better than him last year. Goff had the far more consistent career, but Lynch improved every year. The cons against Goff are that he lacks ideal size and that he didn't win many games in college. Like I already said, Lynch has the best size of any QB in the draft and his team had excellent success this year. You could argue that Goff plays against the toughest competition out of all the 3 QBs, which is true, but the Pac 12 had a down year and Cal was still awful. Lynch had his team undefeated for most of the season.
How was Lynch "better than" Goff last year? What are you basing that opinion on?