Twitter: CeeDee Lamb since Dak returned

starfan1

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,520
Reaction score
12,617
But I thought Dak couldn't elevate receivers. I read it on this forum, so it must be true .
you know there are alot of cowboy fans on this site secretly hoping and praying for a 1 and done so they can continue their narrative. It would be too painful to admit they were wrong. anyway its not about dak its about the team and how well they perform.
 

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,519
Reaction score
21,014
Only a Dak Hater who doesn't know what takes to shave off 7 secs in a mile run would make this analogy.

Sounds smart and click baity BUT actually very dumb when held to reality.

Between the age of 18-22 I ran a mile in about 5 minutes. Technically you're right. It was a terrible analogy. I wasn't shaving 7 seconds off my best time on my best day. But I wasn't going for realism here, I was going for how it looked to most people.

Either way, 68 yards in 5 games is insignificant. My analogy also looks insignificant to most people that never ran track. Like I said, the difference could have been the result of one play. But the fact remains that the production was close. Same number of TDs, and 68 yards different in 5 games.
 

Longboysfan

hipfake08
Messages
13,323
Reaction score
5,801
I think the Commanders have a real shot at over taking the Giants who after a fast start and much hype can finish in it’s accustomed stained paneled wood basement in lovely New Jersey . I want to see the Dak Lamb combo light up Wash & Philly coming soon to a theater near us and into playoff opponents .

The next three games will certainly add to the statistical sugar high .

Fixed it.
 

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,519
Reaction score
21,014
Only a Dak Hater who doesn't know what takes to shave off 7 secs in a mile run would make this analogy.

Sounds smart and click baity BUT actually very dumb when held to reality.

I also want to point out one other thing. You were spot on in you're critique of my post. What you didn't need to add was the Dak hater comment. That was unnecessary. It would be like me calling you a Dak jock sniffer. You have no reason to defend Dak against another Cowboys fan unless you have an unhealthy love for him. It can be a little creepy. Dak doesn't need your defense. To suggest that I hate Dak is just as dumb as what you were accusing me of. Other than that you were spot on.
 

BoyzBlaster

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,293
Reaction score
4,164
Put down the pipe. Breathe some fresh air. I merely pointed to a statistic. There was no great difference from what Lamb did with Rush as opposed to Dak like the OP would suggest. The difference in 5 games was 68 yards. There was no great difference. 68 yards in 5 games can happen in one play. It's not something to brag about. It's like bragging that you ran a mile in 6 minutes on Monday, then ran the same mile on Tuesday in 5 minutes and 53 seconds. Whoopty doo!! Congrats. The numbers are basically the same if you take into account the normal chance of randomness. Yet Dak jock sniffers are jumping all over these 68 yards. That's embarrassing.

Of course Dak is a better QB than Rush. Numbers should add up to more offensive production overall. But the OP was CeeDee Lamb since Dak's return. Well, what about it? It's roughly the same.
Exactly it's really that one game against GB where Cee Dee had 150 yards and a season high 15 targets that's skewing things. But credit to Cee Dee he is having a better year even if it's largely due to getting a lot of targets. He still has to get open.
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,417
Reaction score
32,807
We're still arguing about Dak's performance? :laugh:

Look, everyone here knows (or should know) what Dak does, positive performance-wise, doesn't matter until the playoffs.

Dak's reputation will be made in the playoffs, as all Cowboys great quarterbacks have.

The only way he's going to change the minds of those inclined against him is if he takes this team to a Super Bowl and wins it. And he'll have to make some significant plays along the way. He can't simply be a Trent Dilfer or Jeff Hostetler riding the coattails of a great defense.

Or as Bruce Hornsby sang ... That's just ...

 

Ren

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,218
Reaction score
1,944
Lamb looked like a bust early in the season but has flipped that on its head since dude looks like a legit #1
 

Qcard

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,635
Reaction score
8,214
I also want to point out one other thing. You were spot on in you're critique of my post. What you didn't need to add was the Dak hater comment. That was unnecessary. It would be like me calling you a Dak jock sniffer. You have no reason to defend Dak against another Cowboys fan unless you have an unhealthy love for him. It can be a little creepy. Dak doesn't need your defense. To suggest that I hate Dak is just as dumb as what you were accusing me of. Other than that you were spot on.
It’s only creepy IF you don’t realize the root word for Hate is “Less Love”….:muttley:

Mea Culpa. Apologies if I come of rugged….Dak Less Love:thumbup:
 

RustyBourneHorse

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,085
Reaction score
48,720
you know there are alot of cowboy fans on this site secretly hoping and praying for a 1 and done so they can continue their narrative. It would be too painful to admit they were wrong. anyway its not about dak its about the team and how well they perform.

I know, which is why I made the joke.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
85,566
Reaction score
77,815
my bad…only 4 probowls….and semantics…traded, discarded, given away, cut…
Yeah Pro Bowls and All Pro are completely different. Because if you get rid of an All Pro you will feel the effects of it. You get rid of a pro bowler who gets in based on reputation? All of a sudden your team gets better.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
85,566
Reaction score
77,815
you know there are alot of cowboy fans on this site secretly hoping and praying for a 1 and done so they can continue their narrative. It would be too painful to admit they were wrong. anyway its not about dak its about the team and how well they perform.
You notice how they don’t post when we win? But when we lose somehow they show up like roaches.
 

starfan1

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,520
Reaction score
12,617
You notice how they don’t post when we win? But when we lose somehow they show up like roaches.
Ya they certainly are much more active in losses. Or if they do post in wins it’s less and narrative focused and not realistic
Trolls for sure
 
Top