DFWJC
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 62,249
- Reaction score
- 51,036
Very recently in 2023show me the last time say a 4th seed won the tournament.
A 7th seed won it in 2014
Very recently in 2023show me the last time say a 4th seed won the tournament.
Upsets are more likely in college basketball. There is also a much bigger talent gap between upper level and mid majors in football than basketball.Do you feel the same way about college basketball? Is 64 teams way too much and they should cut it down to 16 teams instead?
What doesn’t hold water is comparing college football to basketball. Less players, talent more spread out, in basketball one great player can carry a team for games, etc.Lol. 12 teams is “too many”, yet 3 years ago the 13-16th ranked team won it all in Basketball.
I also know that in 1985, Villanova who was the 29th-32nd overall team won it.
So your criteria doesn’t hold water at all, and you would regularly exclude the true champions from the playoffs.
NCState made the Final Four as an 11 seed in 2024.Very recently in 2023
A 7th seed won it in 2014
Well, Texas also had 3 losses. Nobody has more money to spend than they do. OSU spent the most and had the same end result as Bama. So money isn't everything.Maybe. I think money talks and that's why Bama had 3 losses.
I know you really never bother to think this through, but here it isLol. 12 teams is “too many”, yet 3 years ago the 13-16th ranked team won it all in Basketball.
I also know that in 1985, Villanova who was the 29th-32nd overall team won it.
So your criteria doesn’t hold water at all, and you would regularly exclude the true champions from the playoffs.
coaching dudeWell, Texas also had 3 losses. Nobody has more money to spend than they do. OSU spent the most and had the same end result as Bama. So money isn't everything.
I think a lot of this simply comes down to the play of the QB. In the playoff, the 2 best QBs have been Mendoza and Carson Beck. Thats your national title game.
And why shouldn't teams have their chaance? Did the Panthers deserve to be in the playoffs? I mean, they had zero shot at winning a super bowl, why let them in?Lol. 12 teams is “too many”, yet 3 years ago the 13-16th ranked team won it all in Basketball.
I also know that in 1985, Villanova who was the 29th-32nd overall team won it.
So your criteria doesn’t hold water at all, and you would regularly exclude the true champions from the playoffs.
True, but why would that be a reason to limit who gets in? Why not let 16 in and let them have their shot?I know you really never bother to think this through, but here it is
IF even in basketball where if you have five really good starters you could go very far, the lowest seed to win it all is at best for all time maybe 30th, what does that say about football when you need four times as many good to top players?
just how many schools could possibly at any one time have that many?
at BEST half of that, right?
you willing to think on this logically then roman circus fixation?
Oooo, tough one. A good coach is nothing w/o a QB, but a QB is nothing w/o good coaching. It's almost equal, IMO.coaching dude
that is way more often the difference then QB
Crystobal couldn't win in Miami until they purchased the services of Carson Beck. Thats the difference. Same with OSU. Sayin was not good enough this year. Same coaching staff and loaded roster. Different result. This is true in the NFL. Show me a HOF coach and i'll show you the hall of fame QB who got him there...... Brady settled this debate when he won in Tampa while Belechek imploded without him.coaching dude
that is way more often the difference then QB

Evenin Tcat! I'm with you, I can't see Indiana losing this game.Indiana by 10+![]()
How'r ya doin jazz?Going for Indiana
