- Messages
- 101,852
- Reaction score
- 112,771
Yeah Henson is simply TERRIBLE!!!!!!!!CactusCowboy said:Both Suck, Who Cares????
Not.
Yeah Henson is simply TERRIBLE!!!!!!!!CactusCowboy said:Both Suck, Who Cares????
abersonc said:Keep in mind there was a good wind today -- 15-20 MPH noted in the gamebook. he certainly could improve his long tosses - but the wind could have been a factor on those throws as well
LaTunaNostra said:I wouldn't even know where to begin to separate the variables that would make the comparison relevant.
I do recall tho, that even by NFLE standards, Hutch played behind the most awful oline imaginable. Of course, he's never been one to make an oline look more competent, but that one was a pitful human turnstyle event. While Drew has had rather more 'luck' (knock on wood) with protection. So far.
Hutch had one game, early in the season that was pretty sharp. Accuracy and zip on intermediate passes, touch on short ones, and of course, his trademark arm strength throwing long. Like his one great game in Chicago, it didn't add up to a hill of beans, however. Certainly didn't convince Bill that he could play.
Steady progress is what I hope we see in Drew. Not one week of glory and a month of debacle. Probably the only realistic point of comparison is if Drew can prove by the NFLE season end that he is 'coachable'..that his mechanics improve, as well as the speed of his processing. Consistency, or some measure of it.
Hutch didn't achieve that, no matter what the stats say.
jcblanco22 said:I do think that there is one important difference that hasn't been mentioned when comparing the NFLE experience of these two guys.
If I remember correctly, Hutchinson was sent there after having had an opportunity to play an extended period during the 2002 NFL regular season (9 starts if memory serves me correct), in addition to seeing preseason action during both the 2002 and 2003 preseasons in Dallas.
Henson meanwhile, has been sent there with one half of NFL regular season experience to his credit, along with some preseason experience the two years he's been in Dallas.
Those 9 games that Hutchinson had over Henson in NFL experience, even if they'd come almost two years prior to this NFLE tenure, would probably give Hutchinson a pretty big "head start" in terms of how he'd handle things, you would think.
TruBlueCowboy said:I'm also curious who got more time in college. I want to say it was Hutchinson.
Silverstar said:If you don't have the NFL Network are you simply S.O.L. on catching these games?
theWave21 said:Chang looks like more of a big league passer than Henson.
RealCowboyfan said:What separates Henson from Hutchinson.. is the mobility, decision making, and release..
Henson is better than Hutchinson...
lspain1 said:I agree with this....but I'm not sure that means he's our future yet. The jury's still out.
abersonc said:and it should be out for a while.
there is a reason we signed him for 8 years. lots of first round picks take a few years to develop -- why would anyone expect something different from Henson who was out of the game for a while?
Henson only had either 7 or 9 starts is all. I don't remember exactly.jcblanco22 said:I know Henson left after his junior season, but wasn't he behind Brady his freshman year? I think they both played about 2 full college seasons.
Great point.abersonc said:Incidentally if Hutch threw the ball away on those 5 plays where he was sacked, his QB rating would drop to 80.4. But he would have saved 5 turnovers.
big dog cowboy said:Henson only had either 7 or 9 starts is all. I don't remember exactly.
RCowboyFan said:Ratings don't tell the whole story, since Hutchinson looked far worse than Henson, other than 2-3 good games he had, Hutch was disaster there. And I was rooting for his success. I mean disaster if you compare Henson to Hutch.
Plus Henson completion % is little bit misleading since he has quite few throw aways too.