Chad Hutchinson vs. Drew Henson: NFL Europe stats after 3 games

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
lspain1 said:
Yeah, the question is do we have the time?

Well we better, otherwise the deal was stupid. Why would you sign a long term developmental contract without being committed to him for 4-5 years?
 

p1_

New Member
Messages
658
Reaction score
0
RCowboyFan said:
Ratings don't tell the whole story, since Hutchinson looked far worse than Henson, other than 2-3 good games he had, Hutch was disaster there. And I was rooting for his success. I mean disaster if you compare Henson to Hutch.

Plus Henson completion % is little bit misleading since he has quite few throw aways too.

What's most telling to me are the sack and fumble stats. Markedly different, and I expect that to be a trend that continues.
 

RCowboyFan

Active Member
Messages
6,926
Reaction score
2
theWave21 said:
I just get the feeling that Henson doesn't have what it takes to be an NFL passer. As much as I'd love for him to be a stud, I'm just not feeling it. He has big leauge arm strength, but doesn't have any touch and his accuracy is questionable at best. Stud quarterbacks make all the throws look easy and he just doesn't do that. From what i've seen, Chang looks like more of a big league passer than Henson.

:laugh1: :lmao2:
 
Top