HeavyHitta31 said:It has nothing to do with calling out Watkins and everything to do with thinking that a rookie 5th round pick is going to show his full potential in his first year. If he plays great, then yeah, it's obvious he's a keeper, but if he plays subpar, giving up on him after year one and drafting a replacement is beyond idiotic. It's hard to be presumptuous when someone posts the following:
Now, considering this kid will likely come out to the draft next year, this is clearly saying if Watkins doesnt pan out after one year, draft someone better. Pretty cut and dry.
Knee jerk. Got it?
CanadianCowboysFan said:Another game where luck and the refs make it easy for South Bend City College.
The phantom clip probably cost JoPa's team a TD so instead of 13-7 at the half, it's 20-0. Before that was the muffed FG.
ND with its patented "brutal" schedule where they play real teams at home (other than USC) and then factor in the three "tough and brutal" military academies.
tomson75 said:Since when does drafting someone automatically preclude another player from continuing to play or perform his job. Have you ever heard of depth? I believe i also mentioned something about versatility, a trait that many football coaches find benefitial.
I don't recall anyone saying he was better than Watkins. All that wa said was that i'd take him in the draft. Now, if he's going in the first or second round, then forget it, we have more pressing issues. That doesn't mean that at some point in the draft we aren't a good enough team that we can draft the BPA, and if that were the case with Zbikowski, i'd love to have him.
HeavyHitta31 said:Drafting for depth in the first few rounds is stupid when you have glaring issues that need to be addressed in terms of starters, like O-Line and WR.
Rack said:Drafting strictly for need is stupid.
Tell me this, let's say WatKINS has a so-so season. Nothing great, but not bad at all.
Zbikowski is on the board and EASILY the best player left on the board. Do you take him?
HeavyHitta31 said:Drafting for depth in the first few rounds is stupid when you have glaring issues that need to be addressed in terms of starters, like O-Line and WR.
CanadianCowboysFan said:Another game where luck and the refs make it easy for South Bend City College.
The phantom clip probably cost JoPa's team a TD so instead of 13-7 at the half, it's 20-0. Before that was the muffed FG.
ND with its patented "brutal" schedule where they play real teams at home (other than USC) and then factor in the three "tough and brutal" military academies.
So Weis is on his way to winning his fourth game over a team with a winning record?Rack said:... just said Brady Quinn has Moxie.
Rack said:
I would think it would be obvious to anyone with at least a small bit of football knowledge.
But you are the person that believes in the 30 yard slant so you obviously have less then "a little bit" of football knowledge.
Rack said:Sorry...
First round.
Rack said:Drafting strictly for need is stupid.
Tell me this, let's say WatKINS has a so-so season. Nothing great, but not bad at all.
Zbikowski is on the board and EASILY the best player left on the board. Do you take him?
Rack said:Sorry...
First round.
jimmy40 said:So Weis is on his way to winning his fourth game over a team with a winning record?
HeavyHitta31 said:Awesome, thanks for reinforcing my point
Obvious, huh?
DeMarcus Ware had 65 tackles for loss in college (That's not counting sacks), and 14.5 tackles for loss last season
But you're right, the man just couldnt stop a runningback top save his mother's life
Dear God, you're out of your mind