I do wish people understood that statement saying 97% of "scientist" believe this to be fact.
The last conference that included a much larger sample size had numbers closer to 25-30%.
What happened was the had about 4000 in the 1st survey but eliminated more that 3920 of them for various reasons.
The remaining ones were basically those receiving government grants.
I know you'll be hard pressed to find a geophysicist or geologist that would say man-made global warming is a sure thing...and a large number say "no way". I know a ton of very bright science PHDs...far FAR brighter than many of these so called climate scientists.
I personally wouldn't go solar as to write off the premis entirely, but it has massive flaws on so any levels. It also has some things to pay attention to.
One thing for sure, we need to keep overt pollution under control. Take care of our planet.
But I do think Al Gore is a crook who made 100s of millions off of what has not yet turned about to be like he predicted it would be by 2014.
Never say ever though.
The funny question some are now asking is assuming pollution was magically under control and China and India complied....is a warming globe actually a bad thing?
Many say the sum improvements may actually be better than the bad. Many areas not used could become viable.
Don't ask me.....
