CNNSI Power Rankings - More of the same

Looking at those rankings and seeing Cleveland at #32, I still can't believe that the one year that we had their #1 pick... they screw around and win 10 games.

Unbelievable. Truly. They have sucked completely every single year except the one we needed them to. :banghead:
 
AsthmaField;2929815 said:
Looking at those rankings and seeing Cleveland at #32, I still can't believe that the one year that we had their #1 pick... they screw around and win 10 games.

Unbelievable. Truly. They have sucked completely every single year except the one we needed them to. :banghead:

True, but the way I look at it, Parcells was going to take Spears even if we'd been picking a lot higher, so this way we at least paid him less than we would have. :)
 
Maybe the guy rewatched the Cowboys last game of the season...
 
AsthmaField;2929815 said:
Looking at those rankings and seeing Cleveland at #32, I still can't believe that the one year that we had their #1 pick... they screw around and win 10 games.

Unbelievable. Truly. They have sucked completely every single year except the one we needed them to. :banghead:

We got Felix out of it so it all worked out in the end
 
Ren;2929846 said:
We got Felix out of it so it all worked out in the end

AsthmaField;2929815 said:
Looking at those rankings and seeing Cleveland at #32, I still can't believe that the one year that we had their #1 pick... they screw around and win 10 games.

Unbelievable. Truly. They have sucked completely every single year except the one we needed them to. :banghead:

Felix > Mcfadden
Felix's contract > Mcfaddens contract
 
Yeah people forget that Wade got this teams record to 13-3 in 2007. And this team seems much more talented than the team in 2007 minus TO.
 
I dont know how Wade will cut out penalties, it doesnt look promising. But he doesnt need to babysit anymore.
 
changing the rankings based on preseason record is absurd
 
fortdick;2929532 said:
Who was coaching this team in 2007, when they went 13-3? Wade can't do a damned thing with all the injuries we had last year.

Seems so simple, but some just don't get it.
 
Pre-camp ranking: 8 Dallas Cowboys
I'm not sure why I've dropped the Cowboys from my pre-camp top 10 down toward the bottom of my second 10 just six weeks later.
The writer has been watching ESPN too much.
 
BrAinPaiNt;2929567 said:
I don't really have a problem with where he ranked us.

I just don't get his rationale behind it and apparently he does not either. His reasons just did not seem to make much sense.

This.

I don't mind being ranked #32 as long as they are able to produce a legitimate and logical argument supporting their claim.

Talking about opening a stadium and wondering if punters were trying to punt at a video board does not suffice.

I don't however, think we should be ranked #32 at all, so I hope everyone doesn't start screaming doom and gloom at me ;)
 
Daudr;2929527 said:
This guy is on crack. He has the Jets, Miami and Seattle all ranked higher than us.

Exactly what I was getting ready to post. Even the skeptics should know better than this. And yes, Miami will not come close to repeating last year's record.
 
Star4Ever;2930271 said:
Reading is fundamental. They went up 16 spots.


semantics. the number dropped. did you not think i saw the packers as 3rd on the chart? did you think they could have possibly been negative 13 on the rankings?
 
Based on some of your posts, I frankly don't have a damn clue what your're normally trying to say.
 
Star4Ever;2930294 said:
Based on some of your posts, I frankly don't have a damn clue what your're normally trying to say.

so why even respond to me? did you think i was going to agree with you by saying i don't know how to read? there is an ignore feature. use it.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,585
Messages
14,546,839
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top