TwoDeep3
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,506
- Reaction score
- 17,339
I hope this is the right spot for this - TD3
Slate joins the growing list of publications no longer using the ‘Commanders’ name
The name of the Washington professional football organization — that would be "Commanders," for those of you coming to the story late — continues to provoke ire amongst those who believe it is disrespectful, outdated and/or classless. But since it's clear that team owner Daniel Snyder has no intention of changing the team name, opponents of the burgundy-and-gold squad have decided to use other ways of protesting the team's name.
Several publications have stopped using the name "Commanders" altogether in their coverage of the team. Add Slate to that number, as the website announced it will no longer use the name in an article entitled "The Washington ________."
The article is lengthy but well worth a read; writer David Plotz threads the rhetorical needle, acknowledging both the team's history as well as the outdated nature of the name. Opponents of a name change should take the time to actually read the article before mounting a HELL NO! HAIL TO THE Commanders! counterattack. (We write that knowing that there's a measurable segment of the Commanders audience, including Snyder himself, who staunchly refuse to acknowledge any view but their own.)
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-s...t-publications-no-longer-using-193111340.html
Slate joins the growing list of publications no longer using the ‘Commanders’ name
The name of the Washington professional football organization — that would be "Commanders," for those of you coming to the story late — continues to provoke ire amongst those who believe it is disrespectful, outdated and/or classless. But since it's clear that team owner Daniel Snyder has no intention of changing the team name, opponents of the burgundy-and-gold squad have decided to use other ways of protesting the team's name.
Several publications have stopped using the name "Commanders" altogether in their coverage of the team. Add Slate to that number, as the website announced it will no longer use the name in an article entitled "The Washington ________."
The article is lengthy but well worth a read; writer David Plotz threads the rhetorical needle, acknowledging both the team's history as well as the outdated nature of the name. Opponents of a name change should take the time to actually read the article before mounting a HELL NO! HAIL TO THE Commanders! counterattack. (We write that knowing that there's a measurable segment of the Commanders audience, including Snyder himself, who staunchly refuse to acknowledge any view but their own.)
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-s...t-publications-no-longer-using-193111340.html
Last edited by a moderator: