*CONFIRMED post #238, pg 16* Tank Johnson Would Be Available to Us In Week 9

Hostile;1638534 said:
Okay everyone listen up.

Ms. Hunter from the NFL offices called me back. This is exactly what she said, word for word.

"Tank Johnson's suspension is a rolling suspension. He has served 1 game of his 8 game suspension."

I was dead wrong and I eat the crow I promised I would. Serve it up.


ooops sorry I was wrong, but I have never heard of a rolling suspension when did those get invented and why does it not apply to AB and others?
 
BigDFan5;1638532 said:
Thurman already served his suspension while under contract you dolt

He is STILL under contract

And then why is he being used s an example f why no contract = no time served. Im far from stupid and if you dont understand the nature of the argument perhaps you should shut up before making stupid comments like this one.

So far ive seen Thurman, AB, Q and Williams used as examples and none of them have held up.

Noone has signed AB and Q, Thurman served his suspension and Williams was retired and thus was not seeking NFL employment. Any other examples?
 
BigDFan5;1638540 said:
ooops sorry I was wrong, but I have never heard of a rolling suspension when did those get invented and why does it not apply to AB and others?
I am guessing it has to do with his being on the Bears when suspended. I have no idea otherwise.
 
jungle_crow.jpg
 
Hostile;1638534 said:
Okay everyone listen up.

Ms. Hunter from the NFL offices called me back. This is exactly what she said, word for word.

"Tank Johnson's suspension is a rolling suspension. He has served 1 game of his 8 game suspension."

I was dead wrong and I eat the crow I promised I would. Serve it up.

move over hos. i'll bring my own hooters bently sauce. as you can see above, there is a lot of debate over the issue and if this is what the NFL has said - i am wrong.

frying up more for anyone else interested.
 
Hostile;1638542 said:
I am guessing it has to do with his being on the Bears when suspended. I have no idea otherwise.

I would say it has to do with him seeking NFL employment after being cut. I actually wouldnt be surprised to see AB signed after next week as well.
 
FuzzyLumpkins;1638552 said:
i wont hold my breath for an apology.

apologies dude. not that hard to admit when wrong - even from a heated debate. i was wrong, so apologies to you.
 
Hostile;1638555 said:
I thought I did. Sorry. I was wrong.

Nah man youre all class as usual im talking about the dolt comments and whatnot from others.

I actually enjoy good debates like this and if youre simply bringing along the discussion that is never a thing to need to apologize for.
 
peplaw06;1638557 said:
Thanks for the info Hos... Interesting stuff.
I am floored.

I'd have lost money on a bet.

At least I sought a real source to end this, and the proof is that I provided a name and it contradicted my stance. I have a feeling that if my stance was verified the argument still rages on.
 
iceberg;1638559 said:
apologies dude. not that hard to admit when wrong - even from a heated debate. i was wrong, so apologies to you.

we really get into some heated ebates esp concerning dogs and I think that carried over to this one. i wasnt exactly being nice myself so Id say you deserve an apology from me as well.
 
FuzzyLumpkins;1638562 said:
Nah man youre all class as usual im talking about the dolt comments and whatnot from others.

I actually enjoy good debates like this and if youre simply bringing along the discussion that is never a thing to need to apologize for.

My post said sorry before you made yours mentioning it
 
FuzzyLumpkins;1638562 said:
Nah man youre all class as usual im talking about the dolt comments and whatnot from others.

I actually enjoy good debates like this and if youre simply bringing along the discussion that is never a thing to need to apologize for.
It was a great debate. I'm almost sad it's over.
 
Hostile;1638563 said:
I am floored.

I'd have lost money on a bet.

At least I sought a real source to end this, and the proof is that I provided a name and it contradicted my stance. I have a feeling that if my stance was verified the argument still rages on.
I really had no inclination to one side or to the other, other than the fact that it wouldn't seem fair to me. But we all learned something today.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,608
Messages
14,547,609
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top