Congrats Wade Phillips

[Sarge]

Wade's defenses throughout his career speak for itself. He's always had top shelf defenses everywhere he went.

Yep and to question that is silly.

 

[khiladi]

Offense only put up 7 points against Pack. If I remember correctly it was Garrett that was running that turnover fest of an offense. Yet Wade got chopped.

19 TOs in 8 games by Garrett's offense.. And Wade's defense gave that offense 10 TOs in 8 games to work with..

Wade kept indicating that Garrett needs to learn how to protect the ball in multiple seasons. Dan Reeves should have been here like Wade wanted. It only took 4 years for Jerry to even force a little change and take that advice.

 

[khiladi]

The year Wade lost the team was the year Garrett called a pass play with no time left against the Commanders, right before the half and Choice ended up fumbling and allowing the Commanders to score.. And they needed 80 yards to go and didn't accomplish anything offensively the whole half..

And Garrett disappeared after the game letting Wade take the blame..

The Commanders won that game on that play alone.

Funny how Wade loses the team after half a season and deserves to get fired, ignoring his three winning seasons prior While Garrett has been waffling at .500 his whole career here and blowing three chances at an NFC play-off against NFC East opponents every year and he gets all sorts of excuses..

Even his defenses set records in futility when Kiffin was here and his losses against the Bears and Saints were far worse than the Jaguars and GB... This year was his absolute biggest joke of s coaching job by far and he is still getting excuses. And the hilarious thing is, the best aspect of this team this year was defense, which he can't coach worth crap.

Amazing how Jerry can justify all sorts of coaching changes at various coaching positions, but seem to not be able to justify a HC change on things like continuity.. The Garrett joke continues..

 

[BAT]

You can sit here and state whatever you want after Wade left. Here's what we were after he was fired: 1-7, he wasn't going to have a winning season that year.

Once Romo went down, we lost 17-35 to the freakin' Jags, and 7 to 45 against the Packers. Remember that Packers game? Players pointing fingers, Jenkins letting a player walk into the end zone.

He lost the team and deserved getting fired.

Using that argument, then Garrett absolutely deserves to be fired too. And Garrett does not even have the track record of success that Wade did, yet was retained 2X as long. LOL.

 

[LittleBoyBlue]

With the talent he has to work with, I wonder how much of the results we see is really coaching.

I think his defense will get blasted in super bowl.

All 5 Broncos super bowl losses have been by MASSIVE BLOWOUTS! Make it 6!

DeMarcus Ware does a hoodini in fifty!

 

[Kevinicus]

You can sit here and state whatever you want after Wade left. Here's what we were after he was fired: 1-7, he wasn't going to have a winning season that year.

Once Romo went down, we lost 17-35 to the freakin' Jags, and 7 to 45 against the Packers. Remember that Packers game? Players pointing fingers, Jenkins letting a player walk into the end zone.

He lost the team and deserved getting fired.

The Packer's game is all anyone can point to. One game against the Superbowl champs. Big whoop. The Jags weren't awful back then, and the Cowboys have a very good chance at winning it if Kitna wasn't throwing interceptions all over the place. Garrett has had some bad stinkers (49-17 @ NO), but he's still here.

 

[ROUSH8692]

I just want to take some time to congratulate Wade Phillips on that amazing coaching performance. We are seeing an amazing defense fellas..enjoy it while it lasts.

FYI: He cant hear you

 

[Kevinicus]

I think his defense will get blasted in super bowl.

All 5 Broncos super bowl losses have been by MASSIVE BLOWOUTS! Make it 6!

DeMarcus Ware does a hoodini in fifty!

Most predictions I saw had the Pats blasting that defense too...

 

[mattjames2010]

The Packer's game is all anyone can point to. One game against the Superbowl champs. Big whoop. The Jags weren't awful back then, and the Cowboys have a very good chance at winning it if Kitna wasn't throwing interceptions all over the place. Garrett has had some bad stinkers (49-17 @ NO), but he's still here.

Jags first drive - over 50 yard drive to the TD
Jags second drive - 42 yard TD pass
Jags fourth drive - Jags drive 60 yards for a TD
Jags fifth drive - TD after INT

Sure yeah, Kitna threw INTs, but show me where our defense was holding up? The Jags were moving the ball with ease. The week before, we were up 20-7 in the second quarter, after Romo goes down, we end up losing the game 41-35. And don't make laugh, "The Packers game was only one anyone can point to", it was an embarrassment on prime time TV. Our players didn't want to tackle, were arguing among one another; this was already when we only had one win on the season, coming in week 3.

Again, stop revising history. Unless you guys are going to counter me with actual sold arguments, don't even bother.

 

[mattjames2010]

Using that argument, then Garrett absolutely deserves to be fired too. And Garrett does not even have the track record of success that Wade did, yet was retained 2X as long. LOL.

Yes, because the Garrett discussion is relevant here when we are discussing Wade...

Take your agenda elsewhere.

 

[casmith07]

Some of you guys have come full circle, and it's really entertaining.

 

[BAT]

Yes, because the Garrett discussion is relevant here when we are discussing Wade...

Take your agenda elsewhere.

Facts are not relevant? Or am I not allowed to compare the two? Agenda, full circle .... how about backing up your arguments with something substantive instead of mock indignation.

 

[Kevinicus]

Jags first drive - over 50 yard drive to the TD
Jags second drive - 42 yard TD pass
Jags fourth drive - Jags drive 60 yards for a TD
Jags fifth drive - TD after INT

Sure yeah, Kitna threw INTs, but show me where our defense was holding up? The Jags were moving the ball with ease. The week before, we were up 20-7 in the second quarter, after Romo goes down, we end up losing the game 41-35. And don't make laugh, "The Packers game was only one anyone can point to", it was an embarrassment on prime time TV. Our players didn't want to tackle, were arguing among one another; this was already when we only had one win on the season, coming in week 3.

Again, stop revising history. Unless you guys are going to counter me with actual sold arguments, don't even bother.

What history did I revise? Did I say the D played well against Jacksonville? The D wasn't that good that year. I seem some revisions by you though.

Jags 2nd drive - Fumble (not a TD as you claim)
Jags 4th drive - Punt (not a TD as you claim)
Jags 5th drive - end of half.

Halftime score of 14-3 and that is including 2 missed scoring opportunities by Dallas (75 yard drive ending in an interception and a turnover on downs at the Jax 1 yard line).

Jax got 2 of their 2nd half scores on drives of 33 and 7 yards following 2 more of Kitnas's interceptions.

Yes, please, stop with the revisionist history.



Players arguing means the team quit? Really? Then I guess they quit on Garret quite a few times. The Packers game is the only evidence anyone has, and Garrett has games just as bad...with Romo playing and playoff chances still a very real possibility.

Please come back when you're arguing reality.

 

[TwoCentPlain]

After 4-1/2 years of Garrett, I miss Wade Phillips. Heck, I miss Campo and Gailey and Switzer compared to Garrett.

Good luck Wade.

 

[mattjames2010]

What history did I revise? Did I say the D played well against Jacksonville? The D wasn't that good that year. I seem some revisions by you though.

Jags 2nd drive - Fumble (not a TD as you claim)
Jags 4th drive - Punt (not a TD as you claim)
Jags 5th drive - end of half.

Halftime score of 14-3 and that is including 2 missed scoring opportunities by Dallas (75 yard drive ending in an interception and a turnover on downs at the Jax 1 yard line).

Jax got 2 of their 2nd half scores on drives of 33 and 7 yards following 2 more of Kitnas's interceptions.

Yes, please, stop with the revisionist history.



Players arguing means the team quit? Really? Then I guess they quit on Garret quite a few times. The Packers game is the only evidence anyone has, and Garrett has games just as bad...with Romo playing and playoff chances still a very real possibility.

Please come back when you're arguing reality.

Then what the hell are you arguing? That we were terrible in every aspect of our game, and this is pointing to what? That Wade didn't lose the team? We had ONE win, we still had Romo in most of those games. Our offense wasn't scoring enough points, our defense was declining, and after Romo went down our team quit. So again, what are you trying to defend here? What are you defending Wade with? It's one thing if we were winning games when we had Romo, but we weren't. We were in trouble long before that.

Haha, this is cute. So a team quitting on Wade, not performing well on the defense or offense, and here we are, you're still making....what point? I'm still confused here.

And you say we had "one game" to point to; I'm not seeing much to praise from that Jags game keeping up with an mediocre Jags team for a couple quarters is now some kind of great accomplishment? The score was 35-17, just a week after blowing a 20-7 lead and giving up 34 points after Romo fell. And I just have "one game" to point to?

You can continue to pretend that Packers game was just "one game", everyone who isn't biased knows he lost the team. There is a reason he was fired after that game, right after Jerry said there wasn't a chance in hell he'd fire a coach mid-season. Oh, and your boy Wade even admitted he was a lousy head coach.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...ad-coach-but-im-a-good-defensive-coordinator/

Anything else?

 

[Kevinicus]

Then what the hell are you arguing? That we were terrible in every aspect of our game, and this is pointing to what? That Wade didn't lose the team? We had ONE win, we still had Romo in most of those games. Our offense wasn't scoring enough points, our defense was declining, and after Romo went down our team quit. So again, what are you trying to defend here? What are you defending Wade with? It's one thing if we were winning games when we had Romo, but we weren't. We were in trouble long before that.

Haha, this is cute. So a team quitting on Wade, not performing well on the defense or offense, and here we are, you're still making....what point? I'm still confused here.

And you say we had "one game" to point to; I'm not seeing much to praise from that Jags game keeping up with an mediocre Jags team for a couple quarters is now some kind of great accomplishment? The score was 35-17, just a week after blowing a 20-7 lead and giving up 34 points after Romo fell. And I just have "one game" to point to?

You can continue to pretend that Packers game was just "one game", everyone who isn't biased knows he lost the team. There is a reason he was fired after that game, right after Jerry said there wasn't a chance in hell he'd fire a coach mid-season. Oh, and your boy Wade even admitted he was a lousy head coach.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...ad-coach-but-im-a-good-defensive-coordinator/

Anything else?

I'm arguing the Packers game is the only thing people have to say the team quit. Garrett has coached games where the team "quit" just as much and under much better circumstances. Wade also had (and still has) a much better track record than Garrett.

If Wade lost the team, so did Garrett. One has a record far more deserving of a head coach job.

 

[khiladi]

Jags first drive - over 50 yard drive to the TD
Jags second drive - 42 yard TD pass
Jags fourth drive - Jags drive 60 yards for a TD
Jags fifth drive - TD after INT

Sure yeah, Kitna threw INTs, but show me where our defense was holding up? The Jags were moving the ball with ease. The week before, we were up 20-7 in the second quarter, after Romo goes down, we end up losing the game 41-35. And don't make laugh, "The Packers game was only one anyone can point to", it was an embarrassment on prime time TV. Our players didn't want to tackle, were arguing among one another; this was already when we only had one win on the season, coming in week 3.

Again, stop revising history. Unless you guys are going to counter me with actual sold arguments, don't even bother.

And we lost to the Giants the game before, when the defense produced 5 TOs. Our offense produced less than 300 total yards. Cherry-pick much?

Wade had NO control over the offense. He tried to get Dan Reeves here to teach Garrett how to use a running game to protect the ball and control the clock and not turn the ball over.

Wade may have 'admitted' he was a lousy HC in his jolly self, but he also said he was better HC than Garrett when he tweeted his record.

 

[CCBoy]

What I hold serious, is that I WOULD NOT miss one of Wade's ranch bar BQ's...