My position is and has been throughout that we should keep Romo as backup unless someone gives us a Rd 1 pick this year
I believe that Romo is healthy and is a top 10 QB in a league devoid of good QBs. We are morons to be giving him away just to make him happy
I agree but standard NFL philosophy says you get rid of the expensive older QB, and the jones boys are going to do the usual thing,
they wont be innovative or buck tradition .
plus they want the money saved to be spent on other players.
Dak is the CHEAP young qb for what 3 more years?
It is easy to look at this in the traditional way, it is harder to buck tradition, and keep both starting qb's.
I cant remember another team with this situation in last 10 years, I know SF had montana and young at same time.
They used young, then went back to montana and won another SB, and people said, that after joe was benched for young,
that when he got back starting job, he was the best he ever was. The competition elevated his play and desire.
Then later joe got hurt, and when we played them in playoffs, joe was ready to play but they stayed with young,
I was glad, I was afraid of joe playing but not young. SF lost that game, then joe went to KC.
But this is unusual , and dallas should get something good for romo or keep him till they do, I would even play him
to up his value , or just to see how he does now that he is totally rested up.
For the first time ever we could start tony, and not worry about him getting hurt, because we have dak.
Why not use tony one last year and see what happens ?
If he gets hurt or plays bad , just insert dak, if he plays good and wins, roll with it.
If tony played all year, won the SB, how much could we get for him then?
And if he just plays all year and plays good, wins a playoff game, his value goes way up.
And whole time you still have dak ready to go.
