Is it just me or do all three of these picks scream “we picked solely based on need”?
A lot of people had us taking him in the 3rd round.Truthfully everyone of these players were rumored to Dallas. That's not good because teams will swipe players mentioned to us. The internet buzzed especially Sam Williams name that Dan Quinn loved this guy. We lucky to have them, but need to have a better poker face on who Cowboys are interested in.
Right, Dallas had him ranked 16th… Prisco had him 26th. Williams was a 1st round talent. Kiper said the WR was the 88th ranked player on his board for whatever that’s worth. But hey, Philly got a two down player who’s gassed in the 3rd quarter in a rotation. A WR who misses at least 3 or 4 games a season and an undersized LB who doesn’t like to keep up with his conditioning!Tolbet must have been pretty close to BPA and we’ve heard that Tyler Smith was 16th on their board so I’m not sure we reached.
Is it just me or do all three of these picks scream “we picked solely based on need”?
First off i think people have become obsessive over BPA vs. need.Is it just me or do all three of these picks scream “we picked solely based on need”?
You said the same thing I said but betterI think the cowboys have specific traits they require players to have and that skews their board in favor of certain players compared to consensus boards.
People can say Tyler Smith and Sam Williams were reaches, but the fact of the matter is they possess rare attributes that drive those players up on the Cowboys draft board. And it’s hard to argue with results.
Going to find out all about a new need if the DE they passed on for Smith shows up for NYJ.Clearly it wasn’t BPA. These picks aren’t bad and have potential but there were better players available at other thin positions.
Things are changing in Philly...lol
Dean and Davis
No, the Cowboys had Tyler Smith ranked #16 overall.Is it just me or do all three of these picks scream “we picked solely based on need”?