Cowboys Are Winningest NFL Team

plasticman

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,616
Reaction score
17,757
Of Course, I am referring to winning percentage, Throughout history, the Cowboys have won their regular season games more frequently than any other team in the NFL at 57.3%. In a 16 game season this means the Cowboys have historically averaged 9.2-6.8.

Team _ PCT
Cowboys _ 57.3%
Packers _ 56.9%
Bears _ 56.7%
Dolphins _ 56.3%
Patriots _ 55.4%
49ers _ 54.7%
Giants _ 54.5%
Broncos _ 54.2%
Vikings _ 54.1%
Ravens _ 54.0%
Steelers _ 53.5%
Colts _ 53.2%
Raiders _ 53.2%
Chiefs _ 52.2%
Browns _ 52.0%
Commanders _ 50.6%
Seahawks _ 50.5%
Chargers _ 49.7%
Rams _ 49.5%
Panthers _ 49.0%
Eagles _ 48.4%
Titans _ 47.9%
Bills _ 46.5%
Bengals _ 45.7%
Jets _ 45.6%
Lions _ 45.6%
Saints _ 44.2%
Texans _ 44.2%
Jaguars _ 44.0%
Falcons _ 43.8%
Cardinals _ 42.7%
Buccaneers _ 38.9%


The Packers have just recently creeped up on the Bears, who was in first place until the 2014 season when the Cowboys regained the spot.

How many games behind are the Packers. In order to calculate this, we must realize that, each new win effects each team differently as a proportion because they have played different amounts of games. Some teams are much older and have been around for almost a hundred years. The more games that have been played, the less impactful a new game result becomes.

Here is an analogy. Suppose we have a bathtub and a swimming pool filled partially with water. If we add five new gallons of water to the bathtub we can see the difference in water level. However, if we add five gallons to the swimming pool it is barely noticeable.

You could think of the Bears as being the swimming pool and the Ravens being the bathtub. A victory by the Ravens is almost 8 times more impactful then a bears victory with respect their overall records.

The trick is to calculate algebraically how many additional victories it would take for a team to reach the same percentage as the Cowboys. The number of games behind represent the number of Team win/Cowboy loss combinations it would take to equal the Cowboys.

Team _ GB
Cowboys _ 0
Packers _ 5
Dolphins _ 8
Ravens _ 11
Bears _ 16
Vikings _ 27
Broncos _ 27
49ers _ 27
Panthers _ 29
Texans _ 32
Patriots _ 32
Giants _ 36
Seahawks _ 43
Jaguars _ 47
Browns _ 52
Raiders _ 70
Colts _ 77
Titans _ 81
Steelers _ 84
Bengals _ 87
Chiefs _ 87
Bills _ 93
Saints _ 100
Falcons _ 105
Buccaneers _ 118
Chargers _ 130
Commanders _ 155
Rams _ 170
Jets _ 202
Eagles _ 203
Lions _ 273
Cardinals _ 370


You can see now the teams that are closest to passing the Cowboys, none should be too much of a surprise.

In the case of the Lions, they would have to go undefeated for 17 consecutive years while the Cowboys would have to lose every game in the same time period.
 

Jstopper

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,488
Reaction score
8,007
Of Course, I am referring to winning percentage, Throughout history, the Cowboys have won their regular season games more frequently than any other team in the NFL at 57.3%. In a 16 game season this means the Cowboys have historically averaged 9.2-6.8.

Team _ PCT
Cowboys _ 57.3%
Packers _ 56.9%
Bears _ 56.7%
Dolphins _ 56.3%
Patriots _ 55.4%
49ers _ 54.7%
Giants _ 54.5%
Broncos _ 54.2%
Vikings _ 54.1%
Ravens _ 54.0%
Steelers _ 53.5%
Colts _ 53.2%
Raiders _ 53.2%
Chiefs _ 52.2%
Browns _ 52.0%
Commanders _ 50.6%
Seahawks _ 50.5%
Chargers _ 49.7%
Rams _ 49.5%
Panthers _ 49.0%
Eagles _ 48.4%
Titans _ 47.9%
Bills _ 46.5%
Bengals _ 45.7%
Jets _ 45.6%
Lions _ 45.6%
Saints _ 44.2%
Texans _ 44.2%
Jaguars _ 44.0%
Falcons _ 43.8%
Cardinals _ 42.7%
Buccaneers _ 38.9%


The Packers have just recently creeped up on the Bears, who was in first place until the 2014 season when the Cowboys regained the spot.

How many games behind are the Packers. In order to calculate this, we must realize that, each new win effects each team differently as a proportion because they have played different amounts of games. Some teams are much older and have been around for almost a hundred years. The more games that have been played, the less impactful a new game result becomes.

Here is an analogy. Suppose we have a bathtub and a swimming pool filled partially with water. If we add five new gallons of water to the bathtub we can see the difference in water level. However, if we add five gallons to the swimming pool it is barely noticeable.

You could think of the Bears as being the swimming pool and the Ravens being the bathtub. A victory by the Ravens is almost 8 times more impactful then a bears victory with respect their overall records.

The trick is to calculate algebraically how many additional victories it would take for a team to reach the same percentage as the Cowboys. The number of games behind represent the number of Team win/Cowboy loss combinations it would take to equal the Cowboys.

Team _ GB
Cowboys _ 0
Packers _ 5
Dolphins _ 8
Ravens _ 11
Bears _ 16
Vikings _ 27
Broncos _ 27
49ers _ 27
Panthers _ 29
Texans _ 32
Patriots _ 32
Giants _ 36
Seahawks _ 43
Jaguars _ 47
Browns _ 52
Raiders _ 70
Colts _ 77
Titans _ 81
Steelers _ 84
Bengals _ 87
Chiefs _ 87
Bills _ 93
Saints _ 100
Falcons _ 105
Buccaneers _ 118
Chargers _ 130
Commanders _ 155
Rams _ 170
Jets _ 202
Eagles _ 203
Lions _ 273
Cardinals _ 370


You can see now the teams that are closest to passing the Cowboys, none should be too much of a surprise.

In the case of the Lions, they would have to go undefeated for 17 consecutive years while the Cowboys would have to lose every game in the same time period.

That shows how scary it is that we were dominant for so long. The patriots have won double digit games every year for the last 17 years and STILL are 32 games behind us. Jeez.
 

plasticman

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,616
Reaction score
17,757
Should have more than 5 championships.

We should buy the Cowboys are never lucky. They always have to earn their rings.

Did you all know:

When you look at all the NFL championship games, Super Bowl and previous NFL championship games, both against the Packers, the Cowboys are 5-5. Every single loss was by a TD or less. Every single victory was by double digits.

Futhermore, if the Cowboys had beaten Green Bay in the championship games those two consecutive years, they would have played in Super Bowls I and Ii The first three were before the merger.
 

IrishAnto

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,068
Reaction score
1,997
Of Course, I am referring to winning percentage, Throughout history, the Cowboys have won their regular season games more frequently than any other team in the NFL at 57.3%. In a 16 game season this means the Cowboys have historically averaged 9.2-6.8.

Team _ PCT
Cowboys _ 57.3%
Packers _ 56.9%
Bears _ 56.7%
Dolphins _ 56.3%
Patriots _ 55.4%
49ers _ 54.7%
Giants _ 54.5%
Broncos _ 54.2%
Vikings _ 54.1%
Ravens _ 54.0%
Steelers _ 53.5%
Colts _ 53.2%
Raiders _ 53.2%
Chiefs _ 52.2%
Browns _ 52.0%
Commanders _ 50.6%
Seahawks _ 50.5%
Chargers _ 49.7%
Rams _ 49.5%
Panthers _ 49.0%
Eagles _ 48.4%
Titans _ 47.9%
Bills _ 46.5%
Bengals _ 45.7%
Jets _ 45.6%
Lions _ 45.6%
Saints _ 44.2%
Texans _ 44.2%
Jaguars _ 44.0%
Falcons _ 43.8%
Cardinals _ 42.7%
Buccaneers _ 38.9%


The Packers have just recently creeped up on the Bears, who was in first place until the 2014 season when the Cowboys regained the spot.

How many games behind are the Packers. In order to calculate this, we must realize that, each new win effects each team differently as a proportion because they have played different amounts of games. Some teams are much older and have been around for almost a hundred years. The more games that have been played, the less impactful a new game result becomes.

Here is an analogy. Suppose we have a bathtub and a swimming pool filled partially with water. If we add five new gallons of water to the bathtub we can see the difference in water level. However, if we add five gallons to the swimming pool it is barely noticeable.

You could think of the Bears as being the swimming pool and the Ravens being the bathtub. A victory by the Ravens is almost 8 times more impactful then a bears victory with respect their overall records.

The trick is to calculate algebraically how many additional victories it would take for a team to reach the same percentage as the Cowboys. The number of games behind represent the number of Team win/Cowboy loss combinations it would take to equal the Cowboys.

Team _ GB
Cowboys _ 0
Packers _ 5
Dolphins _ 8
Ravens _ 11
Bears _ 16
Vikings _ 27
Broncos _ 27
49ers _ 27
Panthers _ 29
Texans _ 32
Patriots _ 32
Giants _ 36
Seahawks _ 43
Jaguars _ 47
Browns _ 52
Raiders _ 70
Colts _ 77
Titans _ 81
Steelers _ 84
Bengals _ 87
Chiefs _ 87
Bills _ 93
Saints _ 100
Falcons _ 105
Buccaneers _ 118
Chargers _ 130
Commanders _ 155
Rams _ 170
Jets _ 202
Eagles _ 203
Lions _ 273
Cardinals _ 370


You can see now the teams that are closest to passing the Cowboys, none should be too much of a surprise.

In the case of the Lions, they would have to go undefeated for 17 consecutive years while the Cowboys would have to lose every game in the same time period.


As nice a stat as that is, we all know which games mean the most when talking about winning.

In that regard counting both the number of games played and won the last 22 years show we’ve hit rock bottom, which considering our previous history make it all the harder to swallow.
 

Blackspider214

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,130
Reaction score
15,994
I am a San Antonio guy too. I think they are the Cowboys of the NBA.

My justification? Which NBA team now has 20 ,consecutive winning seasons?

No way. Lakers are the Cowboys of the NBA. They have deep history and even in their down years, they are a hot topic. Spurs are the Patriots of the NBA. No real history but very good recently. Both are also teams no one will care about once they fall off. Unlike the Cowboys and Lakers.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
81,310
Reaction score
102,239
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
No way. Lakers are the Cowboys of the NBA. They have deep history and even in their down years, they are a hot topic. Spurs are the Patriots of the NBA. No real history but very good recently. Both are also teams no one will care about once they fall off. Unlike the Cowboys and Lakers.

Weren't the Spurs an old ABA team, as the the Patriots were an old AFL team....:muttley:
I understand what you mean though.
 

Biggems

White and Nerdy
Messages
14,327
Reaction score
2,254
No way. Lakers are the Cowboys of the NBA. They have deep history and even in their down years, they are a hot topic. Spurs are the Patriots of the NBA. No real history but very good recently. Both are also teams no one will care about once they fall off. Unlike the Cowboys and Lakers.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but the Spurs have only 6 losing seasons and have only missed the playoffs 4 times since they joined the NBA in 1973. In the late 70s, they wete up 3-1 in the ECF before losing to Washington. In the early 80s, they kept running into Showtime, but did almost beat them once. 44 years isn't recent, that is pretty long term. Also, they have a winning record against all other NBA teams. No other NBA team can boast this, nor can any other major North American sports franchise, with respect to the opponents in their league.

But I do not consider them the Cowboys either. We are a small market, fiscally responsible team. We are not global entities. The Cowboys, Lakers, and Yankees are.

I don't like comparing us to the Pats, since they are known cheaters. Still Brady and Duncan, BB and Pop, 5 Rings, winningest teams in their sport for 2 plus decades. But, the Pats have the major media in Boston. But both did it with some majorly overarching role players.
 

Proximo

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,697
Reaction score
9,117
That's awesome!

Wait, we have only won 2 playoff games in 21 years, so who gives a ****.

Then why waste your time even watching regular season games if you can't sit back from time to time and enjoy the success that the team experienced there?

You guys with this attitude on here are hilarious.

Let's say hypothetically we won a bunch of divisional round games but no conference championships during the last 21 years?

If someone pointed out the divisional round success then we'd all hear a bunch of you big babies saying "who gives a **** we can't win the conference"

Or, if we'd have gotten to several SB's but lost, we'd hear "who gives a **** about the conference we get creamed in the SB!".

Just admit that the REAL aspect of being a fan that makes you happy is that it gives you something to complain about. "Happily unhappy".
 

cowboyblue22

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,031
Reaction score
8,707
most all of records like this come from the success of the late 60's 70' and early 90's
 

MileyDancer

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,669
Reaction score
5,321
Then why waste your time even watching regular season games if you can't sit back from time to time and enjoy the success that the team experienced there?

You guys with this attitude on here are hilarious.

Let's say hypothetically we won a bunch of divisional round games but no conference championships during the last 21 years?

If someone pointed out the divisional round success then we'd all hear a bunch of you big babies saying "who gives a **** we can't win the conference"

Or, if we'd have gotten to several SB's but lost, we'd hear "who gives a **** about the conference we get creamed in the SB!".

Just admit that the REAL aspect of being a fan that makes you happy is that it gives you something to complain about. "Happily unhappy".
Thanks for your long-winded response, but you know nothing about me.
 
Top