Cowboys at Broncos who has the edge? Denver Post opinion

IF we lose tomorrow, I am certain it will not be because of their so-called QB. Either their defense gets a score or two or we implode on offense but Trevor will not be a deciding factor :yourock:
 
Anyone paying attention to the last 3 years know Dallas is a threat with a healthy QB.

This just in: DAK is ready to roll.

we ll see. I saw 2 coaches last year squander a 13-3 record, home field advantage and lose it to a team in the first round that has beat on them for at least 3 years and do it with gusto, The only noise Garrett and company created was being laughed at.

Will it happen again this year. i dont know, but im not going to pretend last year didnt happen either. IF teams who won the SB within 3 years want to talk smack , they have that right. A team who has not seen the SB in over 20 years, well smack talk isnt for them until their team does something.
 
shocking that a home-town paper has their team winning...just shocking

Dallas offense>Denver defense
Dallas Defense (minimally) = Denver offense

Dallas 23, Denver 16
 
we ll see. I saw 2 coaches last year squander a 13-3 record, home field advantage and lose it to a team in the first round that has beat on them for at least 3 years and do it with gusto, The only noise Garrett and company created was being laughed at.

Will it happen again this year. i dont know, but im not going to pretend last year didnt happen either. IF teams who won the SB within 3 years want to talk smack , they have that right. A team who has not seen the SB in over 20 years, well smack talk isnt for them until their team does something.

Just to be clear on warranted smack talk, you have to have one the superbowl within 3 years for it to be legitimate? What about four years? Im sure 5 is too long right?

How bout get a QB then talk smack?
 
shocking that a home-town paper has their team winning...just shocking

Dallas offense>Denver defense
Dallas Defense (minimally) = Denver offense

Dallas 23, Denver 16

I have advantage Dallas d over their offense. They just don't have any weapons outside of their top 2 recievers. The rb's are average. The QB is terrible.
 
Just to be clear on warranted smack talk, you have to have one the superbowl within 3 years for it to be legitimate? What about four years? Im sure 5 is too long right?

How bout get a QB then talk smack?


3 is fine. 4 can be if you have a history of doing it. 20 years barely sniffing, no. We have a qb, in fact we have a good team. We are hoping the coaches seal the deal. You can win without a qb, but that isnt our problem.
 
im basing it off the facts Dallas was no threat. Woulda coulda shoulda will not win you games. i had complete confidence Dallas would lose that game. i said last seaosn Dallas will win some games but not make any noise, and they made zero noise. the packers have been a bane for us for a while and Garrett can not over come it. his team will have to learn how to do it.

You need to go back to grammar and football school.
 
IF we lose tomorrow, I am certain it will not be because of their so-called QB. Either their defense gets a score or two or we implode on offense but Trevor will not be a deciding factor :yourock:

It'll be because of our QB.
 
shocking that a home-town paper has their team winning...just shocking

Dallas offense>Denver defense
Dallas Defense (minimally) = Denver offense

Dallas 23, Denver 16
Shocking, indeed! Actually, the article is not that far off: they have issues with their offensive which we should be able to exploit; their defensive backfield should have an edge over our receivers; our running game should have success against their defense.

If our run game has success early, It should loosen up the passing game.

Regardless of all this, it should be a good game and result in a win for Dallas.
 
This may be a very tough frustrating game for Dak. He was not very accurate in the first half last week. This defense i think is better than the Giants. So lets see how he does. The bottom line is just win. This is a nice test for Dak.
 
Shocking, indeed! Actually, the article is not that far off: they have issues with their offensive which we should be able to exploit; their defensive backfield should have an edge over our receivers; our running game should have success against their defense.

If our run game has success early, It should loosen up the passing game.

Regardless of all this, it should be a good game and result in a win for Dallas.

Only if Dak feels pressure, gets hit and has no time to find them.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,673
Messages
13,825,579
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top