cowboybish
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 848
- Reaction score
- 1,628
Wasn’t it Juedy Lamb and Ross all picked in a row in the first round?
RuggsWasn’t it Juedy Lamb and Ross all picked in a row in the first round?
They won’t want Armstrong. Free agent after this year, and I wouldn’t think they plan on winning right away.3rd and Armstrong, but they probably would want a 2
You’re right I mixed up our two former BuckeyesJoey Galloway cost two 1sts not Terry Glenn.
Dak straight up2nd rounder and Micah.
No offense, but that’s Jerry thinking….lol…..and we lose out.If no team agrees to a first rounder, I wonder if Denver might settle for a second rounder as the draft approaches?
Part of the deal has to be a contract extension. You have to extend him now, structure it for later restructures and spread it out over years along with what he is owed now.absolute best im offering is our 2nd and one of our 5ths. Seems more like a top tier #2 then a lead receiver. Also will need to get paid same time as lamb.
Wouldn't mind that unless he is asking for like top 5 WR money. Then no.Part of the deal has to be a contract extension. You have to extend him now, structure it for later restructures and spread it out over years along with what he is owed now.
I still believe OBJ is their top choice due to his price and no draft compensationThey won’t want Armstrong. Free agent after this year, and I wouldn’t think they plan on winning right away.
Bland would be a guy who they want. Maybe one of the TE. Think more years of control.
And Dallas had better have a plan as to what to do about retaining both Jeudy and Lamb when their rookie deals expire at the same time.
Lets see if they start dropping the price a bit, they want to regain some draft stock desperately in this draft.Broncos will trade anyone away in order to recoup their losses from Wilson. Problem is they’re gonna ask for too much. Their perspective on draft picks and value is clearly ridiculous.
I still believe OBJ is their top choice due to his price and no draft compensation