So the last two games makes him cut worthy? Or is it the flood of negative reporting that is fueling the idea he is a distraction that is responsible for the five losses since he has suited up?
Just trying to keep up with the flip flopping.
Just to be clear, I don't want to cut him and I supported the move to sign him. I root for my team to win, not to give me life lessons on how to be a decent human being.
There are maybe 5-6 posters by my count so far that have supported cutting him. I don't know if they never supported him or are indeed flip flopping. There are reports of him missing meetings and he has been a PR nightmare since being allowed to talk to the media. I think those two things more than on field performance have led to (some!) people changing their opinion on him.
My issue with your stance is that you, and you aren't the only one guilty of this, are lumping all opinions by various posters on this site and equating it to mean that this board as a whole is flip flopping. That is not the case. There are a lot of different posters, some more rational than others, that have different opinions. Some of us pump sunshine (though there deservedly isn't much of that anymore) some of us are negative, and the majority of us were optimistic before Romo went down. The majority grew concerned when he did, and the majority are now accepting the reality that 2-7 brings.
If you are directing your flip flopping accusation at only the person you quoted, and have evidence that he is indeed flip flopping, then my apologies. But that is not the case, is it?