RainMan;2501034 said:
Because Chris is so obviously in Werder's head in all these videos. It's fairly obvious watching these things that Werder tries to act unaffected, but you know he hears it. And you know it bugs him when he sends others.
Plus, Werder is human like any of us. He can walk over to a fan and spare five minutes and strike up a conversation to diffuse a situation, as opposed to sending one of his irate handlers who makes an arse of the entire network.
But if Chris is just a speck, I guess that would be below the big, bad ESPN employee?
Geez, they're both regular joes. Werder could walk over and strike up a conversation and, if he had any personality at all, probably turn Chris into a fan. You might say why would it matter? Well, for one, it'd spare Werder from looking like a spineless twit in these videos. Secondly, it might let him do his job without someone constantly screaming in the background.
Good post. I think this is why I find it so funny.
I have nothing against Werder. I have nothing against any of the media who report on the team. I do think this story was taken from a comment made by someone and pushed to the point of ridiculous. They tried to make a mountain out of a molehill.
TO met with Garrett. So what? So did Roy and Crayton.
It was to say they are open on a lot of plays. Good. I still don't see anything wrong with it.
It went from something relatively minor like that and made it all the way to TO and Witten were in an altercation and had to be separated. An allegation they both deny.
Might they have disagreed on something? Sure. Do you work with someone that you agree with on every detail? If so, you're very lucky. If the two players reportedly involved don't see it as an issue, why make it one?
In Witten's interview yesterday you can clearly see Werder there asking him about the alleged incidents and he looks Werder right in the eye and says there is nothing to the inuendo. Theebs has already told us that Werder and Witten talk before every game. He even showed us picture proof of it.
So if a player says to Ed, Calvin, Todd, Jen, Mac, JJT, and the gang that Witten and TO don't get along that well it is probably their opinion of it based on their own observations. Might Witten and TO see it differently than this player? Of course they can.
So someone witnessed voices raised. Big damn deal. Werder and ESPN made it out to be Civil War in the locker room and the rest of the media mice followed the Pied Piper's tune.
People are saying, "everyone ran with this story. That should tell you there is something to it." Of course they ran with it. TO + Dallas Cowboys = Ratings.
If I may let me use a metaphor to explain what I am saying. This is like someone breaking a finger nail and getting a full arm cast.
It was nothing. This is per the team and the guys who were involved.
Werder did his job. Unfortunately there was nothing in Al Capone's vault.