that's such a simplistic and fairly disingenuous interpretation.
But accurate.
we all wanted the secondary improved upon. we all had issues with the guys we had. i don't think anyone would have bat an eye at any of them leaving, or all of them leaving eventually. all at once is a bit problematic simply because some form of continuity is important and rookies and young guys have a steep learning curve. not to mention the influx of receiving threats in our division. ideally we have the same draft we had but still have one or two of the guys who left, to reinforce the group and assist in the turnover of the secondary.
So you wanted what they did, but you wanted it
the way you wanted it. You wanted to pull the bandaid off slowly rather than all at once.
None of the players who left is a big loss, they were either average or unreliable. Two thirds of the nickel corners who need the season starting are back in Brown and Scandrick and either Carroll or Awuzie can provide the average play they got from Carr.
Last year's group had their best season in Dallas - across the board. Every single one of them had their best season in Dallas. That's not coincidence, that's good coaching. Good coaching that's still in place and coaching up the new talent the team drafted.
And none of the young guys needs to be forced onto the field, so if they get there, it will be a result of earning it, not because the team had to play them.